Names That Peaked In 1949

These names hit their all-time highest U.S. ranking in 1949 and have never ranked as high since — the sound of that moment, frozen in the data. (The #1 names that year were Linda and James — reigning champions usually peak in a different year than they reign.)

Peaked in 1948Peaked in 1950 Full 1949 top 100The 1940s as a whole
Save nameName & meaning
History
1926–2025, yearly counts; individually scaled
Babies 2025 · rank5-year rank movementPeak year
829#383
Down 61 rank positions in five years
1952
201#1,156
Down 151 rank positions in five years
1951
381#707
Down 60 rank positions in five years
1952
142#1,501
Up 61 rank positions in five years
1950
99#1,948
Down 244 rank positions in five years
1952
183#1,153
Down 49 rank positions in five years
1949
21#5,806
Up 2,356 rank positions in five years
1957
23#4,441
Down 1,704 rank positions in five years
1949
86#2,169
Down 278 rank positions in five years
2000
9#10,784
Down 3,904 rank positions in five years
1956
14#7,801
Down 1,999 rank positions in five years
1989
—Unranked
—
1961
29#3,835
Up 682 rank positions in five years
1954
—Unranked
—
1949
—Unranked
—
1949
—Unranked
—
1949
—Unranked
—
1963
—Unranked
—
1949
7#12,741
Down 2,714 rank positions in five years
1949
—Unranked
—
1954
—Unranked
—
1985
—Unranked
—
1959
—Unranked
—
1949
—Unranked
—
1949
—Unranked
—
1954
—Unranked
—
1949
—Unranked
—
1949
—Unranked
—
1949

Page 1 of 1

How this list is built

A name “peaked” in 1949 when that year holds its best-ever position in the national rankings — rank, not raw count, because raw counts track how many babies were born and would pile every “peak” into the boom years. To qualify, a name must have reached the top 1,000 at its height and have at least 500 all-time applications. Lists are ordered by that peak rank.

Ranks come from U.S. births, counted separately for girls and boys. “Unranked” today means fewer than 5 applications in the latest year — uncommon, never invalid.