Giulianna
#4,916 in 2025Girls' nameMeaning not yet documented
Giulianna has been given to 1,488 babies in the U.S. since 1990. In 2025 it ranked #4,916 of 17,293 girls’ names in use. Its peak year was 2010, with 109 recorded.
Babies named Giulianna, 2025
1 in 123,000
Giulianna over time, 1880–2025
Based on births in the U.S. Babies given the name each year. Hover the chart — or focus it and use the arrow keys — for any year. Gaps mean the name was given fewer than 5 times that year; these counts are unpublished.
How common is Giulianna?
Everything below is computed from the 2025 data — the most recent year available.
- Among all babies, 2025
- 1 in 123,000
- 27 of 3,315,165 births
- Among girls only
- 1 in 59,500
- <0.01% of girls
- Rank, 2025
- #4,916
- of 17,293 girls’ names in use
- Coin-flip room size
- 85,108 kids
- Even odds of a second one
Where Giulianna sits on the popularity scale
Chance at least one other child shares the name
If the other children were drawn at random from the 2025 national name distribution. Real classrooms cluster by region and community, so treat these as a floor, not a ceiling.
Put another way: gather 85,108 children born in 2025 and it's an even bet that one of them is another Giulianna. In a class of 30 the chance is Under 1%.
When Giuliannas were born
Half of everyone ever recorded as Giulianna was born before 2012 — so the typical Giulianna is around 13 today.
- Biggest decade
- 2010s
- 52.1% of all use
- Born in the last 25 years
- 93.3%
- A modern name
- Recorded since 1950
- 1,488
- People you could plausibly meet
2010s — 52.1% of all recorded uses (775).
Is Giulianna rising or falling?
Rank movement and count movement can disagree — the number of distinct names in use keeps growing, so a name holding a steady count still slides down the list. Both are shown.
- Rank vs 1 year ago
- −1,000
- Places dropped
- Rank vs 5 years ago
- −1,273
- Places dropped
- Rank vs 10 years ago
- −2,527
- Places dropped
- Births vs 10 years ago
- 0.35×
- Fewer babies than then
- Share of its own peak
- 24.8%
- Peak was 2010 (109)
- Years since peak
- 15
- Years
- Year-to-year steadiness
- Shifting
- 21.5% average annual change
Spellings of Giulianna
Giulianna is not the most common spelling — Julianna is, with 62.4% against Giulianna's 1.8%.
Grouped by closeness of spelling (up to two letter changes), same sex, with a floor on all-time use. It catches Sophia/Sofia and Aiden/Ayden, and misses spellings that sound alike but look different, like Sean and Shawn.
Where Giulianna is used
Across 2016–2025, Giulianna was most concentrated in New York — about 1 in 14,286 girls, against 1 in 28,770 across all states with data. It was least common in Pennsylvania (1 in 100,000).
Most concentrated
- 1New York1 in 14,286
- 2California1 in 25,000
- 3Florida1 in 25,000
- 4New Jersey1 in 25,000
- 5Massachusetts1 in 33,333
- 6Arizona1 in 50,000
- 7Texas1 in 50,000
- 8Pennsylvania1 in 100,000
Shading is the share of that state's recorded girls given this name, not the raw count — otherwise the map would just show which states are biggest. Unshaded states have no published records for this period. U.S. birth records suppress state-year counts below 5; state counts therefore don't add up to the national total. Every state links to its full rankings.
Giulianna around the world
Where Giulianna ranks in official birth records elsewhere in the world. Rankings only — the number of births isn’t comparable between places, so it isn’t shown.
- France2011–2025#1,929in 2025
- Canada2010–2013#3,199in 2013
- South Australia1989–1989#692in 1989
Popularity data from Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques, Statistics Canada and Consumer and Business Services (South Australia). INSEE data under Licence Ouverte / Etalab 2.0. StatCan data under Statistics Canada Open Licence. CBS SA data under CC BY 4.0.
Giulianna by the numbers
The raw record for each sex the name is used for.
Names similar to Giulianna
Matched on shared beginnings and endings, similar length, and comparable popularity.
Sibling names for Giulianna
Names from the same era and popularity tier — the two things that make a sibling set feel deliberate — skipping lookalike spellings and shared initials.