Simranjit
UnisexGirls' nameBoys' nameMeaning not yet documented
Simranjit has been given to 84 babies in the U.S. since 1996. It was used fewer than 5 times in 2025, so it doesn't appear in the latest year's list — today it's a genuinely uncommon pick. Its peak year was 1997, with 11 recorded. It's used for both sexes: 83% girls, 17% boys all-time.
Babies named Simranjit, 2013
1 in 729,000
Simranjit over time, 1880–2025
Based on births in the U.S. Babies given the name each year. Hover the chart — or focus it and use the arrow keys — for any year. Gaps mean the name was given fewer than 5 times that year; these counts are unpublished.
Girls or boys — Simranjit over time
In 2013, Simranjit went to 100% girls and 0% boys.
A sex is only published in years it reached five applications, so a stretch at 0% or 100% means the other side stayed under that floor — not that it was never used.
How common is Simranjit?
Simranjit had fewer than 5 recorded uses in 2025, so these figures use 2013, the last year it was published.
- Among all babies, 2013
- 1 in 729,000
- 5 of 3,645,938 births
- Among girls only
- 1 in 351,000
- <0.01% of girls
- Rank, 2013
- Unranked
- Fewer than 5 uses
- Coin-flip room size
- 505,435 kids
- Even odds of a second one
Where Simranjit sits on the popularity scale
Chance at least one other child shares the name
If the other children were drawn at random from the 2013 national name distribution. Real classrooms cluster by region and community, so treat these as a floor, not a ceiling.
Put another way: gather 505,435 children born in 2013 and it's an even bet that one of them is another Simranjit. In a class of 30 the chance is Under 1%.
When Simranjits were born
Half of everyone ever recorded as Simranjit was born before 2002 — so the typical Simranjit is around 23 today.
- Biggest decade
- 2000s
- 51.4% of all use
- Born in the last 25 years
- 100.0%
- A modern name
- Recorded since 1950
- 70
- People you could plausibly meet
2000s — 51.4% of all recorded uses (36).
Is Simranjit rising or falling?
Rank movement and count movement can disagree — the number of distinct names in use keeps growing, so a name holding a steady count still slides down the list. Both are shown.
- Rank vs 1 year ago
- —
- Not ranked then
- Rank vs 5 years ago
- New entry
- Not ranked then
- Rank vs 10 years ago
- —
- Not ranked then
- Births vs 10 years ago
- —
- Not published both years
- Share of its own peak
- 0%
- Peak was 1997 (11)
- Years since peak
- 28
- Years
- Year-to-year steadiness
- Volatile
- 30.8% average annual change
Where Simranjit is used
Across 1910–2025, Simranjit was most concentrated in California — about 1 in — girls, against 1 in 1,334,398 across all states with data.
Most concentrated
- 1California1 in —
Shading is the share of that state's recorded girls given this name, not the raw count — otherwise the map would just show which states are biggest. Unshaded states have no published records for this period. U.S. birth records suppress state-year counts below 5; state counts therefore don't add up to the national total. Every state links to its full rankings. Simranjit has too little recent state data to map, so this covers all years from 1910.
Simranjit around the world
Where Simranjit ranks in official birth records elsewhere in the world. Rankings only — the number of births isn’t comparable between places, so it isn’t shown.
- England & Wales1996–2011#5,785in 2011
- Canada1992–2004#2,752in 2004
- South Australia2011–2011#840in 2011
Popularity data from Office for National Statistics, Statistics Canada and Consumer and Business Services (South Australia). ONS data under Open Government Licence v3.0. StatCan data under Statistics Canada Open Licence. CBS SA data under CC BY 4.0.
Simranjit by the numbers
The raw record for each sex the name is used for.
As a girl's name
Names similar to Simranjit
Matched on shared beginnings and endings, similar length, and comparable popularity.
Sibling names for Simranjit
Names from the same era and popularity tier — the two things that make a sibling set feel deliberate — skipping lookalike spellings and shared initials.