Girl Names Ending In K

Girls' names ending in K, ranked by how many babies actually got them — not by editorial preference — plus which ones are climbing and how the ending itself has moved.

Share of girls, 2025
0.04%
vs 0.03% in 2000
Names in use
22
115 recorded since 1880
Ending peaked
1980
at 0.05% of names
Rank among 26 last letters
#20
by 2025 share

How K has fared since 1880

Share of all listed U.S. births given a name ending in K, year by year. Plotted as a share rather than a count — raw counts track how many babies were born, so every ending would appear to peak in 1957.

188019532025
Save nameName & meaning
History
1926–2025, yearly counts; individually scaled
Babies 2025 · rank5-year rank movementPeak year
32#4,372
Down 816 rank positions in five years
1980
137#1,544
Down 46 rank positions in five years
2011
6#13,882
Down 6,169 rank positions in five years
1928
32#4,415
Down 1,610 rank positions in five years
1950
27#4,943
Down 1,776 rank positions in five years
2013
60#2,847
Down 229 rank positions in five years
2021
35#4,138
Up 3,307 rank positions in five years
2022
115#1,764
Up 2,650 rank positions in five years
2025
17#6,740
Up 1,522 rank positions in five years
2001
5#16,132
Down 3,313 rank positions in five years
1987
18#6,372
Down 1,018 rank positions in five years
2021
7#12,686
Down 3,944 rank positions in five years
2010
26#5,052
Up 1,181 rank positions in five years
2022
12#8,439
Down 2,750 rank positions in five years
2023
9#10,359
Down 578 rank positions in five years
2021
9#10,419
new
2018
6#13,418
Up 2,009 rank positions in five years
2017
22#5,689
new
2025
10#9,974
new
2025
12#8,762
new
2025
10#9,952
new
2025
5#16,066
Up 204 rank positions in five years
2020

Page 1 of 1

Biggest K names of all time

By total applications since 1880 — a different list from the one above, because it counts every generation, not just this one.

Browse every girls’ name ending in K

Every other ending

Sources & methodology

Rankings and counts come from official birth card-application data, 1880–2025. Counts are card applications rather than births, and any name given to fewer than 5 babies of one sex in a year is not published — so “—” means genuinely uncommon, never invalid. The “climbing fastest” row ranks by five-year rank movement as a ratio, and a name must be inside the top 1,000 with at least 200 applications in 2025 to qualify — a looser gate than the site-wide trending list uses, because inside a single ending the stricter one leaves some endings empty. Ending shares are measured over listed names only, and the 25-year comparison is a generation rather than five years because ending fashion moves far more slowly than any one name.