Names That Peaked In 1951

These names hit their all-time highest U.S. ranking in 1951 and have never ranked as high since — the sound of that moment, frozen in the data. (The #1 names that year were Linda and James — reigning champions usually peak in a different year than they reign.)

Peaked in 1950Peaked in 1952 Full 1951 top 100The 1950s as a whole
Save nameName & meaning
History
1926–2025, yearly counts; individually scaled
Babies 2025 · rank5-year rank movementPeak year
381#729
Down 204 rank positions in five years
1952
70#2,522
Down 560 rank positions in five years
1951
1,915#191
Up 3 rank positions in five years
1955
12#8,533
Down 2,379 rank positions in five years
1951
45#3,433
Up 45 rank positions in five years
1951
848#360
Up 18 rank positions in five years
1953
80#2,286
Down 578 rank positions in five years
1951
6#14,255
Down 2,539 rank positions in five years
1960
—Unranked
—
1951
281#859
Down 176 rank positions in five years
1951
540#559
Up 206 rank positions in five years
1954
102#1,652
Down 230 rank positions in five years
1991
17#6,700
Down 3,334 rank positions in five years
1987
29#3,761
Up 1,108 rank positions in five years
1992
—Unranked
—
1958
—Unranked
—
1960
28#4,852
Down 612 rank positions in five years
1994
—Unranked
—
1959
21#4,755
Down 11 rank positions in five years
1991
—Unranked
—
1951
—Unranked
—
1951
7#11,997
Down 2,412 rank positions in five years
1951
—Unranked
—
1951

Page 1 of 1

How this list is built

A name “peaked” in 1951 when that year holds its best-ever position in the national rankings — rank, not raw count, because raw counts track how many babies were born and would pile every “peak” into the boom years. To qualify, a name must have reached the top 1,000 at its height and have at least 500 all-time applications. Lists are ordered by that peak rank.

Ranks come from U.S. births, counted separately for girls and boys. “Unranked” today means fewer than 5 applications in the latest year — uncommon, never invalid.