Names That Peaked In 1952
These names hit their all-time highest U.S. ranking in 1952 and have never ranked as high since — the sound of that moment, frozen in the data. (The #1 names that year were Linda and James — reigning champions usually peak in a different year than they reign.)
| Save name | Name & meaning | History 1926–2025, yearly counts; individually scaled | Babies 2025 · rank | 5-year rank movement | Peak year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 558#536 | Down 38 rank positions in five years | 1956 | |||
| 129#1,410 | Down 54 rank positions in five years | 1958 | |||
| 219#1,096 | Down 75 rank positions in five years | 1952 | |||
| 82#1,914 | Down 342 rank positions in five years | 1959 | |||
| 20#5,002 | Down 1,219 rank positions in five years | 1952 | |||
| 237#1,051 | Down 202 rank positions in five years | 1955 | |||
| 121#1,473 | Up 21 rank positions in five years | 1956 | |||
| 5#15,446 | new | 1952 | |||
| 95#1,712 | Down 37 rank positions in five years | 1952 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1952 | |||
| 14#6,190 | Down 3,045 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| 39#3,827 | Up 709 rank positions in five years | 1958 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1953 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1960 | |||
| 22#4,691 | Up 7,229 rank positions in five years | 1952 | |||
| 12#8,687 | Down 3,089 rank positions in five years | 1956 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1952 | |||
| 14#7,624 | Up 3,847 rank positions in five years | 1952 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1952 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1952 | |||
| 7#12,274 | Down 1,762 rank positions in five years | 1991 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1956 | |||
| 31#4,525 | Down 863 rank positions in five years | 1952 | |||
| 15#6,071 | Down 1,252 rank positions in five years | 1952 | |||
| 5#13,257 | Down 4,751 rank positions in five years | 1952 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1952 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1955 | |||
| 6#13,487 | Up 269 rank positions in five years | 1952 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1955 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1952 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1955 |
Page 1 of 1
How this list is built
A name “peaked” in 1952 when that year holds its best-ever position in the national rankings — rank, not raw count, because raw counts track how many babies were born and would pile every “peak” into the boom years. To qualify, a name must have reached the top 1,000 at its height and have at least 500 all-time applications. Lists are ordered by that peak rank.
Ranks come from U.S. births, counted separately for girls and boys. “Unranked” today means fewer than 5 applications in the latest year — uncommon, never invalid.
