Names That Peaked In 1962
These names hit their all-time highest U.S. ranking in 1962 and have never ranked as high since — the sound of that moment, frozen in the data. (The #1 names that year were Lisa and Michael — reigning champions usually peak in a different year than they reign.)
| Save name | Name & meaning | History 1926–2025, yearly counts; individually scaled | Babies 2025 · rank | 5-year rank movement | Peak year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 256#991 | Up 46 rank positions in five years | 1965 | |||
| 493#593 | Down 158 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| 400#704 | Up 197 rank positions in five years | 1961 | |||
| 124#1,443 | Down 42 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| 23#5,531 | Down 1,935 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| 114#1,520 | Down 195 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| 35#3,341 | Down 526 rank positions in five years | 1961 | |||
| 101#1,659 | Down 227 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| 52#2,551 | Down 447 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| 5#12,678 | Down 1,604 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| 5#16,907 | Up 250 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| 43#2,913 | Down 173 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| 55#2,457 | Down 311 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1962 | |||
| 13#8,242 | Down 2,210 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| 7#12,643 | Down 3,919 rank positions in five years | 1961 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1961 | |||
| 33#4,306 | Down 992 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| 48#3,287 | Up 480 rank positions in five years | 1970 | |||
| 137#1,364 | Up 161 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1962 | |||
| 20#6,044 | Up 1,063 rank positions in five years | 1961 | |||
| 5#17,013 | Down 10,120 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| 5#13,699 | new | 1962 | |||
| 37#3,188 | Down 637 rank positions in five years | 1970 | |||
| 60#2,831 | Down 355 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| 27#4,016 | Down 621 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| 21#5,887 | Up 1,300 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| 29#4,743 | Up 403 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1962 | |||
| 24#4,273 | Down 1,609 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1962 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1962 | |||
| 10#9,678 | Up 1,774 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1962 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1962 | |||
| 6#14,316 | new | 1962 |
Page 1 of 1
How this list is built
A name “peaked” in 1962 when that year holds its best-ever position in the national rankings — rank, not raw count, because raw counts track how many babies were born and would pile every “peak” into the boom years. To qualify, a name must have reached the top 1,000 at its height and have at least 500 all-time applications. Lists are ordered by that peak rank.
Ranks come from U.S. births, counted separately for girls and boys. “Unranked” today means fewer than 5 applications in the latest year — uncommon, never invalid.
