Names That Peaked In 1963
These names hit their all-time highest U.S. ranking in 1963 and have never ranked as high since — the sound of that moment, frozen in the data. (The #1 names that year were Lisa and Michael — reigning champions usually peak in a different year than they reign.)
| Save name | Name & meaning | History 1926–2025, yearly counts; individually scaled | Babies 2025 · rank | 5-year rank movement | Peak year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,628#221 | Down 64 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| 118#1,726 | Down 54 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| 232#985 | Down 282 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| 65#2,686 | Down 1,081 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| 165#1,342 | Up 192 rank positions in five years | 1957 | |||
| 368#740 | Down 13 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| 12#8,794 | Up 2,170 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| 275#941 | Up 473 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| 8#11,507 | Up 196 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| 69#2,122 | Down 105 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| 58#2,917 | Down 551 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| 8#11,172 | new | 1963 | |||
| 37#3,217 | Down 1,059 rank positions in five years | 1962 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1963 | |||
| 14#7,656 | Down 1,198 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| 7#10,453 | Up 3,191 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| 9#10,560 | Down 2,767 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| 32#4,359 | Up 524 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| 376#716 | Up 275 rank positions in five years | 2025 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1963 | |||
| 65#2,186 | Up 511 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| 15#7,406 | Up 5,725 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| 91#2,069 | Down 444 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| 11#9,137 | Down 972 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1963 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1963 | |||
| 14#6,365 | Down 725 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| 12#8,652 | Up 71 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| 28#3,863 | Down 123 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| 7#9,860 | Down 144 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1963 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1963 | |||
| 36#3,301 | Up 33 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1963 | |||
| 9#8,674 | Up 2,828 rank positions in five years | 1963 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1963 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1963 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1963 | |||
| 11#7,619 | Up 4,235 rank positions in five years | 1963 |
Page 1 of 1
How this list is built
A name “peaked” in 1963 when that year holds its best-ever position in the national rankings — rank, not raw count, because raw counts track how many babies were born and would pile every “peak” into the boom years. To qualify, a name must have reached the top 1,000 at its height and have at least 500 all-time applications. Lists are ordered by that peak rank.
Ranks come from U.S. births, counted separately for girls and boys. “Unranked” today means fewer than 5 applications in the latest year — uncommon, never invalid.
