Names That Switched Gender

Ashley was a boys’ name. So were Taylor, Madison, Leslie and Shannon. These are the 61 names in 146 years of U.S. records whose sex association actually reversed — not names that lean one way, names that changed sides.

All61Became girls’ names52Became boys’ names9

The rare direction, and worth reading carefully: several of these reflect a Spanish, Catalan or French masculine name arriving in the U.S. rather than an English name changing sides.

Save nameName & meaning
History
1926–2025, yearly counts; individually scaled
Babies 2025 · rank5-year rank movementPeak year

Ruler of the world

89#1,796
Up 20 rank positions in five years
1952

Gift of God in the Theodore family; bold people in the Theobald family

3,945#82
Up 90 rank positions in five years
2023

Yahweh is gracious, through John

176#1,172
Up 248 rank positions in five years
1993

God is gracious, through the John name family

47#2,731
Down 675 rank positions in five years
1954

Bright fame

69#2,122
Down 105 rank positions in five years
1963

Variant of Tristan; meaning uncertain

116#1,512
Down 663 rank positions in five years
1996

Greek Lord; also a modern invented name

1,416#244
Down 20 rank positions in five years
2017

Short form of Gerald, Gerard, or Geraldine

8#9,182
Down 3,860 rank positions in five years
1958

Yahweh is gracious, through John

232#987
Up 148 rank positions in five years
2025

Page 1 of 1

Names marked *

How a name qualifies

The birth data records each name separately for girls and for boys, so a name’s girls’ share in any year is simply the girls’ count divided by both. A name makes this list when that share started on one side of 50%, ended on the other, and moved at least 50 points in between — measured over 10-year windows at each end so a single noisy year can’t qualify a name. It also needs 20K uses overall.

“Crossed” is the year the five-year rolling share passed 50%, so treat it as approximate. Because a name is only published for a sex in years it reached five applications, a share of 0% means “recorded below the publication floor”, not zero babies.

The share is a ratio of two counts from the same year, so unlike most statistics on this site it needs no adjustment for the fact that far more babies were born in 1960 than in 1890.