Immaculate
Girls' nameMeaning not yet documented
Immaculate has been given to 68 babies in the U.S. since 1917. It was used fewer than 5 times in 2025, so it doesn't appear in the latest year's list — today it's a genuinely uncommon pick. Its peak year was 1917, with 8 recorded.
Babies named Immaculate, 1948
1 in 690,000
Immaculate over time, 1880–2025
Based on births in the U.S. Babies given the name each year. Hover the chart — or focus it and use the arrow keys — for any year. Gaps mean the name was given fewer than 5 times that year; these counts are unpublished.
How common is Immaculate?
Immaculate had fewer than 5 recorded uses in 2025, so these figures use 1948, the last year it was published.
- Among all babies, 1948
- 1 in 690,000
- 5 of 3,452,053 births
- Among girls only
- 1 in 340,000
- <0.01% of girls
- Rank, 1948
- Unranked
- Fewer than 5 uses
- Coin-flip room size
- 478,557 kids
- Even odds of a second one
Where Immaculate sits on the popularity scale
Chance at least one other child shares the name
If the other children were drawn at random from the 1948 national name distribution. Real classrooms cluster by region and community, so treat these as a floor, not a ceiling.
Put another way: gather 478,557 children born in 1948 and it's an even bet that one of them is another Immaculate. In a class of 30 the chance is Under 1%.
When Immaculates were born
Half of everyone ever recorded as Immaculate was born before 1926 — so the typical Immaculate is around 99 today.
- Biggest decade
- 1910s
- 30.9% of all use
- Born in the last 25 years
- 58.8%
- A modern name
- Recorded since 1950
- 0
- People you could plausibly meet
1910s — 30.9% of all recorded uses (21).
Is Immaculate rising or falling?
Rank movement and count movement can disagree — the number of distinct names in use keeps growing, so a name holding a steady count still slides down the list. Both are shown.
- Rank vs 1 year ago
- —
- Not ranked then
- Rank vs 5 years ago
- New entry
- Not ranked then
- Rank vs 10 years ago
- —
- Not ranked then
- Births vs 10 years ago
- —
- Not published both years
- Share of its own peak
- 0%
- Peak was 1917 (8)
- Years since peak
- 108
- Years
- Year-to-year steadiness
- Shifting
- 22.8% average annual change
Where Immaculate is used
Across 1910–2025, Immaculate was most concentrated in New York — about 1 in — girls, against 1 in 625,320 across all states with data.
Most concentrated
- 1New York1 in —
Shading is the share of that state's recorded girls given this name, not the raw count — otherwise the map would just show which states are biggest. Unshaded states have no published records for this period. U.S. birth records suppress state-year counts below 5; state counts therefore don't add up to the national total. Every state links to its full rankings. Immaculate has too little recent state data to map, so this covers all years from 1910.
Immaculate around the world
Where Immaculate ranks in official birth records elsewhere in the world. Rankings only — the number of births isn’t comparable between places, so it isn’t shown.
- England & Wales2008–2008#5,545in 2008
Popularity data from Office for National Statistics. ONS data under Open Government Licence v3.0.
Immaculate by the numbers
The raw record for each sex the name is used for.
Names similar to Immaculate
Matched on shared beginnings and endings, similar length, and comparable popularity.
Sibling names for Immaculate
Names from the same era and popularity tier — the two things that make a sibling set feel deliberate — skipping lookalike spellings and shared initials.