Most Popular Baby Names In Oklahoma
The 100 most-used girls' and boys' names among recorded births from Oklahoma, 2016–2025 — 335,047 applications in that window. Below them: the names Oklahoma uses far more than the rest of the country.
Girls’ names
- 1Olivia2,1081.4%
- 2Emma1,7551.2%
- 3Amelia1,5501.0%
- 4Harper1,4290.9%
- 5Charlotte1,4260.9%
- 6Ava1,4180.9%
- 7Sophia1,3520.9%
- 8Isabella1,3200.9%
- 9Evelyn1,2960.9%
- 10Mia1,1620.8%
- 11Elizabeth1,0010.7%
- 12Abigail9960.7%
- 13Eleanor9470.6%
- 14Avery9150.6%
- 15Hazel8880.6%
- 16Ellie8780.6%
- 17Scarlett8500.6%
- 18Paisley8490.6%
- 19Aurora8410.6%
- 20Ella8330.5%
- 21Luna8230.5%
- 22Willow8230.5%
- 23Nova7860.5%
- 24Violet7720.5%
- 25Lily7380.5%
- 26Emily7330.5%
- 27Layla6950.5%
- 28Camila6900.5%
- 29Sofia6900.5%
- 30Ivy6840.5%
- 31Penelope6760.4%
- 32Chloe6630.4%
- 33Nora6480.4%
- 34Lillian6430.4%
- 35Addison6390.4%
- 36Everly6150.4%
- 37Stella6070.4%
- 38Grace6000.4%
- 39Blakely5920.4%
- 40Aria5910.4%
- 41Mila5620.4%
- 42Zoey5590.4%
- 43Hannah5560.4%
- 44Kennedy5420.4%
- 45Sadie5370.4%
- 46Riley5360.4%
- 47Ruby5270.3%
- 48Emery5250.3%
- 49Madison5250.3%
- 50Hadley5230.3%
- 51Piper5160.3%
- 52Victoria5140.3%
- 53Naomi5110.3%
- 54Claire4950.3%
- 55Lucy4910.3%
- 56Kinsley4870.3%
- 57Eliana4830.3%
- 58Delilah4820.3%
- 59Natalie4790.3%
- 60Parker4760.3%
- 61Elena4720.3%
- 62Brooklyn4690.3%
- 63Caroline4650.3%
- 64Adeline4550.3%
- 65Nevaeh4550.3%
- 66Josie4470.3%
- 67Serenity4470.3%
- 68Isla4430.3%
- 69Rylee4360.3%
- 70Ember4310.3%
- 71Charlie4210.3%
- 72Lydia4210.3%
- 73Audrey4160.3%
- 74Allison4140.3%
- 75Zoe4140.3%
- 76Eden4130.3%
- 77Genesis4120.3%
- 78Alice4110.3%
- 79Athena4110.3%
- 80Millie4060.3%
- 81Iris4050.3%
- 82Anna4020.3%
- 83Emersyn3970.3%
- 84Madelyn3930.3%
- 85Autumn3900.3%
- 86Emilia3890.3%
- 87Adalynn3830.3%
- 88Raelynn3780.2%
- 89Lyla3760.2%
- 90Clara3740.2%
- 91Aspen3720.2%
- 92Presley3720.2%
- 93River3720.2%
- 94Aubrey3700.2%
- 95Vivian3700.2%
- 96Everleigh3660.2%
- 97Savannah3650.2%
- 98Brynlee3560.2%
- 99Cora3560.2%
- 100Gianna3530.2%
Boys’ names
- 1Liam2,2551.2%
- 2Noah1,9271.1%
- 3Oliver1,9161.0%
- 4Elijah1,7511.0%
- 5William1,5520.8%
- 6James1,4710.8%
- 7Wyatt1,3450.7%
- 8Asher1,3210.7%
- 9Benjamin1,2370.7%
- 10Samuel1,2290.7%
- 11Hudson1,2280.7%
- 12Henry1,2260.7%
- 13Lincoln1,2070.7%
- 14Grayson1,1800.6%
- 15Jackson1,1550.6%
- 16Luke1,1390.6%
- 17Lucas1,1270.6%
- 18Maverick1,1180.6%
- 19Carter1,1000.6%
- 20Mason1,0960.6%
- 21Theodore1,0940.6%
- 22Alexander1,0870.6%
- 23Levi1,0850.6%
- 24Jaxon1,0660.6%
- 25Cooper1,0450.6%
- 26Michael1,0400.6%
- 27John1,0150.6%
- 28Owen9840.5%
- 29Mateo9720.5%
- 30Gabriel9610.5%
- 31Ezra9570.5%
- 32Daniel9470.5%
- 33Sebastian9310.5%
- 34Jack9250.5%
- 35Isaac9190.5%
- 36Aiden9160.5%
- 37Logan9160.5%
- 38Waylon9110.5%
- 39David8790.5%
- 40Jacob8530.5%
- 41Easton8510.5%
- 42Joseph8210.4%
- 43Ethan8200.4%
- 44Ezekiel7740.4%
- 45Elias7620.4%
- 46Josiah7600.4%
- 47Ryker7600.4%
- 48Isaiah7560.4%
- 49Matthew7310.4%
- 50Eli7290.4%
- 51Thomas7220.4%
- 52Weston7180.4%
- 53Hunter7170.4%
- 54Brooks7120.4%
- 55Silas7090.4%
- 56Christopher6810.4%
- 57Julian6710.4%
- 58Leo6640.4%
- 59Joshua6590.4%
- 60Greyson6570.4%
- 61Anthony6540.4%
- 62River6470.4%
- 63Santiago6420.4%
- 64Ryder6390.3%
- 65Charles6260.3%
- 66Nolan6260.3%
- 67Axel6130.3%
- 68Parker6130.3%
- 69Roman5990.3%
- 70Braxton5980.3%
- 71Beau5970.3%
- 72Jeremiah5960.3%
- 73Sawyer5930.3%
- 74Andrew5920.3%
- 75Jayden5820.3%
- 76Rhett5810.3%
- 77Miles5800.3%
- 78Everett5720.3%
- 79Bennett5700.3%
- 80Caleb5610.3%
- 81Jasper5580.3%
- 82Carson5530.3%
- 83Adrian5500.3%
- 84Angel5490.3%
- 85Dylan5490.3%
- 86Bentley5480.3%
- 87Jace5450.3%
- 88Christian5370.3%
- 89Rowan5320.3%
- 90Kingston5190.3%
- 91Stetson5070.3%
- 92Colton5060.3%
- 93Aaron5040.3%
- 94Jonathan4920.3%
- 95Kai4920.3%
- 96Walker4910.3%
- 97Nathan4870.3%
- 98Robert4760.3%
- 99Xavier4760.3%
- 100Jordan4750.3%
Oklahoma's signature names
Names used at least 2× as often in Oklahoma as across all states combined, 2016–2025. The multiple compares Oklahoma's share of listed births with the same share pooled across every state — the closest thing to "how Oklahoma does it differently" the data can support.
Girls’ names
- Timber26× · 60 recorded
- Gentry20.4× · 147 recorded
- Blakelee10.3× · 51 recorded
- Lakyn9.6× · 79 recorded
- Lynlee8.8× · 65 recorded
- Brinlee7.1× · 69 recorded
- Laramie6.6× · 50 recorded
- Sterling6.4× · 71 recorded
- Raylee6.3× · 130 recorded
- Kodi5.4× · 54 recorded
- Kimber4.8× · 206 recorded
- Whitley4.7× · 148 recorded
- Preslee4.7× · 50 recorded
- Wrenlee4.6× · 143 recorded
- Emberlyn4.5× · 58 recorded
- Chandler4.4× · 117 recorded
- Emberlee4.4× · 53 recorded
- Austyn4.3× · 90 recorded
- Memphis4.3× · 56 recorded
- Braylee4.2× · 116 recorded
- Emberlynn4.2× · 90 recorded
- Tinley4.2× · 73 recorded
- Hadlee4.1× · 132 recorded
- Aspyn4× · 97 recorded
- Lakelynn3.9× · 87 recorded
Boys’ names
- Ruger9.1× · 80 recorded
- Kreed9× · 82 recorded
- Hagen8.8× · 51 recorded
- Rowdy7.9× · 117 recorded
- Kolter7× · 85 recorded
- Creed6.3× · 213 recorded
- Ryatt6.3× · 117 recorded
- Baker5.8× · 443 recorded
- Chevy5.8× · 52 recorded
- Kooper5.4× · 90 recorded
- Kolt4.6× · 60 recorded
- Boston4.5× · 214 recorded
- Hollis4.3× · 73 recorded
- Kase4× · 120 recorded
- Brecken4× · 105 recorded
- Dutton4× · 59 recorded
- Billy3.9× · 83 recorded
- Ledger3.8× · 164 recorded
- Stetson3.7× · 507 recorded
- Bishop3.7× · 64 recorded
- Talon3.6× · 101 recorded
- Jagger3.5× · 124 recorded
- Landry3.5× · 71 recorded
- Kenai3.5× · 52 recorded
- Slade3.4× · 55 recorded
All-time favorites, 1910–2025
The most-used names across everything Oklahoma has recorded since 1910 — a very different list, dominated by the high-birth, low-variety decades of the mid-century.
Girls’ names
- 1Mary56,0732.6%
- 2Betty27,4981.3%
- 3Linda22,8771.1%
- 4Barbara18,8350.9%
- 5Patricia18,6820.9%
- 6Jennifer17,6420.8%
- 7Dorothy16,7650.8%
- 8Elizabeth16,1530.7%
- 9Helen14,2340.7%
- 10Donna13,6210.6%
- 11Wanda13,1350.6%
- 12Sarah12,8990.6%
- 13Margaret12,6180.6%
- 14Shirley12,1200.6%
- 15Jessica11,8290.5%
- 16Ruth11,5610.5%
- 17Ruby11,4420.5%
- 18Ashley11,3920.5%
- 19Virginia11,2410.5%
- 20Karen11,2320.5%
- 21Sharon11,1190.5%
- 22Carolyn11,0370.5%
- 23Amanda10,9300.5%
- 24Kimberly10,5780.5%
- 25Nancy10,5710.5%
- 26Lisa10,4630.5%
- 27Anna10,3970.5%
- 28Carol10,0650.5%
- 29Sandra10,0490.5%
- 30Rebecca9,8320.5%
- 31Emily9,8070.5%
- 32Susan9,7370.4%
- 33Angela9,7160.4%
- 34Emma9,6250.4%
- 35Stephanie9,2150.4%
- 36Mildred9,0690.4%
- 37Brenda8,9810.4%
- 38Joyce8,9770.4%
- 39Amy8,9670.4%
- 40Deborah8,9210.4%
- 41Laura8,8800.4%
- 42Melissa8,7760.4%
- 43Evelyn8,5670.4%
- 44Frances8,3240.4%
- 45Norma8,3190.4%
- 46Pamela8,3050.4%
- 47Cynthia8,1410.4%
- 48Doris8,1000.4%
- 49Juanita7,8480.4%
- 50Martha7,7890.4%
Boys’ names
- 1James75,7613.2%
- 2John57,7112.4%
- 3Robert55,6692.3%
- 4William50,4232.1%
- 5Michael47,1872.0%
- 6David44,0361.9%
- 7Charles39,4251.7%
- 8Richard26,8701.1%
- 9Christopher25,1101.1%
- 10Billy23,5711.0%
- 11Kenneth22,7441.0%
- 12Donald22,6601.0%
- 13Thomas21,5380.9%
- 14Jerry19,7680.8%
- 15Larry18,6830.8%
- 16Jack17,7080.7%
- 17Joshua17,6710.7%
- 18Matthew17,4360.7%
- 19Joseph17,4330.7%
- 20George17,1900.7%
- 21Gary16,4370.7%
- 22Steven16,3260.7%
- 23Paul16,1810.7%
- 24Daniel16,0470.7%
- 25Mark15,1230.6%
- 26Bobby14,9360.6%
- 27Ronald14,2490.6%
- 28Joe14,1840.6%
- 29Jimmy13,7600.6%
- 30Jason13,4930.6%
- 31Jacob12,8760.5%
- 32Kevin12,2690.5%
- 33Justin12,1250.5%
- 34Roy11,4660.5%
- 35Brian11,4120.5%
- 36Andrew11,2600.5%
- 37Harold11,0670.5%
- 38Timothy11,0170.5%
- 39Brandon11,0120.5%
- 40Raymond10,8770.5%
- 41Anthony10,7700.5%
- 42Carl10,7220.5%
- 43Ryan10,7150.5%
- 44Terry10,3250.4%
- 45Edward10,2770.4%
- 46Stephen10,2070.4%
- 47Samuel9,8770.4%
- 48Jeffrey9,6030.4%
- 49Johnny9,5990.4%
- 50Tyler9,5620.4%
State data starts in 1910 (national data goes back to 1880) and is censored per state and year: a name needs 5 uses in Oklahoma in a year to appear at all. That censoring means state counts never sum to the national total, and it bites hardest on uncommon names in small states.
Counts are based on U.S. births and are tracked separately for girls and boys. Names used fewer than 5 times in a year aren’t published for that year, so totals here are a floor — the shortfall is largest in the sparse early years.