Most Popular Baby Names Of 1885
The 100 most-used girls’ and boys’ names among U.S. births in 1885 — 240,847 recorded births in total that year.
Girls’ names
- 1Mary9,1286.9%
- 2Anna3,9943.0%
- 3Emma2,7282.1%
- 4Elizabeth2,5821.9%
- 5Margaret2,2041.7%
- 6Minnie2,1781.6%
- 7Clara1,9101.4%
- 8Bertha1,8601.4%
- 9Ida1,8541.4%
- 10Annie1,7031.3%
- 11Alice1,6811.3%
- 12Florence1,6671.3%
- 13Bessie1,5881.2%
- 14Grace1,5751.2%
- 15Ethel1,4951.1%
- 16Nellie1,4321.1%
- 17Martha1,4251.1%
- 18Sarah1,4241.1%
- 19Ella1,3951.0%
- 20Mabel1,3491.0%
- 21Laura1,3251.0%
- 22Carrie1,2831.0%
- 23Cora1,2530.9%
- 24Maude1,2220.9%
- 25Rose1,1640.9%
- 26Pearl1,1460.9%
- 27Lillian1,1430.9%
- 28Helen1,1340.9%
- 29Gertrude1,0860.8%
- 30Edna1,0770.8%
- 31Edith1,0710.8%
- 32Julia1,0620.8%
- 33Jennie1,0450.8%
- 34Myrtle1,0260.8%
- 35Mattie1,0140.8%
- 36Hattie1,0080.8%
- 37Lillie9790.7%
- 38Eva9710.7%
- 39Louise9560.7%
- 40Jessie9520.7%
- 41Lula9490.7%
- 42Marie8850.7%
- 43Ada8760.7%
- 44Lena8760.7%
- 45Catherine8460.6%
- 46Frances8440.6%
- 47Fannie7830.6%
- 48Josephine7830.6%
- 49Dora7760.6%
- 50Katherine7510.6%
- 51Maggie7160.5%
- 52Lucy7110.5%
- 53Blanche7100.5%
- 54Agnes6950.5%
- 55Elsie6850.5%
- 56Nora6700.5%
- 57Stella6490.5%
- 58Rosa6230.5%
- 59Effie6130.5%
- 60Daisy6070.5%
- 61May6070.5%
- 62Mamie6060.5%
- 63Mae5780.4%
- 64Ellen5550.4%
- 65Lizzie5370.4%
- 66Nettie5360.4%
- 67Nancy5270.4%
- 68Alma5150.4%
- 69Sadie5140.4%
- 70Ruth5060.4%
- 71Della5000.4%
- 72Susie4770.4%
- 73Sallie4570.3%
- 74Flora4450.3%
- 75Maud4290.3%
- 76Addie4060.3%
- 77Lydia4040.3%
- 78Caroline3990.3%
- 79Mollie3960.3%
- 80Lottie3930.3%
- 81Katie3880.3%
- 82Irene3760.3%
- 83Etta3720.3%
- 84Georgia3710.3%
- 85Lulu3600.3%
- 86Olive3490.3%
- 87Emily3460.3%
- 88Viola3450.3%
- 89Harriet3420.3%
- 90Amanda3390.3%
- 91Jane3300.2%
- 92Esther3200.2%
- 93Kathryn3200.2%
- 94Charlotte3170.2%
- 95Willie3120.2%
- 96Beulah3090.2%
- 97Kate3090.2%
- 98Ollie3050.2%
- 99Rebecca3020.2%
- 100Susan3020.2%
Boys’ names
- 1John8,7568.1%
- 2William8,0447.5%
- 3James5,1754.8%
- 4George4,6744.3%
- 5Charles4,5994.3%
- 6Frank3,0672.8%
- 7Joseph2,5402.4%
- 8Henry2,4062.2%
- 9Robert2,3222.2%
- 10Thomas2,2662.1%
- 11Edward2,2202.1%
- 12Harry2,1982.0%
- 13Walter1,8081.7%
- 14Fred1,5621.4%
- 15Arthur1,5161.4%
- 16Albert1,4291.3%
- 17Clarence9060.8%
- 18Samuel8880.8%
- 19Louis8090.8%
- 20Grover7680.7%
- 21Ernest7180.7%
- 22David7120.7%
- 23Charlie7050.7%
- 24Roy6910.6%
- 25Joe6810.6%
- 26Richard6720.6%
- 27Will6250.6%
- 28Oscar6230.6%
- 29Willie6140.6%
- 30Andrew5990.6%
- 31Jesse5560.5%
- 32Daniel5350.5%
- 33Peter5160.5%
- 34Carl4940.5%
- 35Sam4920.5%
- 36Earl4810.4%
- 37Frederick4660.4%
- 38Benjamin4640.4%
- 39Alfred4460.4%
- 40Elmer4430.4%
- 41Howard4380.4%
- 42Lewis4370.4%
- 43Paul4280.4%
- 44Ralph4220.4%
- 45Herbert3880.4%
- 46Jim3700.3%
- 47Michael3700.3%
- 48Tom3610.3%
- 49Martin3570.3%
- 50Lee3480.3%
- 51Eugene3450.3%
- 52Claude3430.3%
- 53Jacob3430.3%
- 54Ed3280.3%
- 55Herman3260.3%
- 56Francis3190.3%
- 57Clyde3180.3%
- 58Raymond3080.3%
- 59Harvey3040.3%
- 60Edgar3030.3%
- 61Jack2950.3%
- 62Ben2920.3%
- 63Edwin2890.3%
- 64Lawrence2880.3%
- 65Charley2850.3%
- 66Bert2760.3%
- 67Chester2730.3%
- 68Guy2660.2%
- 69Otto2630.2%
- 70Floyd2590.2%
- 71Luther2590.2%
- 72Oliver2580.2%
- 73Hugh2570.2%
- 74Ray2370.2%
- 75Ira2350.2%
- 76Homer2280.2%
- 77Patrick2170.2%
- 78Alexander2050.2%
- 79Isaac2040.2%
- 80Leonard2040.2%
- 81Jessie2020.2%
- 82Harold2010.2%
- 83Leo1990.2%
- 84Theodore1990.2%
- 85Archie1960.2%
- 86August1930.2%
- 87Allen1840.2%
- 88Sidney1700.2%
- 89Philip1630.2%
- 90Leroy1620.2%
- 91Bernard1600.1%
- 92Alex1590.1%
- 93Stephen1580.1%
- 94Horace1550.1%
- 95Anthony1530.1%
- 96Warren1510.1%
- 97Julius1500.1%
- 98Cleveland1470.1%
- 99Leon1460.1%
- 100Victor1430.1%
Percentages are each name’s share of all 1885 applications for that sex — a useful reminder of how much more concentrated naming used to be. In 1880 the top girls’ name alone accounted for several percent of all girls; today the #1 name is well under one percent.
Counts are based on U.S. births and are tracked separately for girls and boys. Names used fewer than 5 times in a year aren’t published for that year, so totals here are a floor — the shortfall is largest in the sparse early years.