Names That Peaked In 1898
These names hit their all-time highest U.S. ranking in 1898 and have never ranked as high since — the sound of that moment, frozen in the data. (The #1 names that year were Mary and John — reigning champions usually peak in a different year than they reign.)
| Save name | Name & meaning | History 1926–2025, yearly counts; individually scaled | Babies 2025 · rank | 5-year rank movement | Peak year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,966#57 | Down 11 rank positions in five years | 1920 | |||
| 93#1,747 | Up 243 rank positions in five years | 1952 | |||
| 28#3,869 | Down 278 rank positions in five years | 1898 | |||
| 27#4,029 | Down 474 rank positions in five years | 1956 | |||
| 47#3,332 | Down 790 rank positions in five years | 1920 | |||
| 22#5,591 | Down 551 rank positions in five years | 1918 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1920 | |||
| 64#2,207 | Up 229 rank positions in five years | 1917 | |||
| 28#4,783 | Down 2,121 rank positions in five years | 1995 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1916 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1918 | |||
| 64#2,704 | Up 862 rank positions in five years | 1916 | |||
| 34#3,434 | Down 1,072 rank positions in five years | 2017 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1921 | |||
| 65#2,200 | Down 316 rank positions in five years | 2017 | |||
| 64#2,213 | Down 517 rank positions in five years | 2015 | |||
| 51#2,583 | Up 454 rank positions in five years | 2023 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1919 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1924 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1989 | |||
| 5#13,774 | new | 1919 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1919 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1971 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1920 | |||
| 13#6,780 | Up 7,168 rank positions in five years | 1918 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1919 | |||
| 40#3,044 | Down 58 rank positions in five years | 2013 | |||
| 5#17,084 | new | 1924 | |||
| 6#14,607 | new | 1898 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1928 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1917 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1920 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1920 | |||
| 12#6,931 | Up 4,137 rank positions in five years | 2004 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1919 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1917 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1954 | |||
| 33#3,449 | Up 4,055 rank positions in five years | 1983 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1919 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1922 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1989 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1922 | |||
| 6#10,863 | Down 95 rank positions in five years | 1919 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 2004 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1923 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1929 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1920 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1919 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1915 | |||
| 9#10,849 | Down 654 rank positions in five years | 1922 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1898 | |||
| —Unranked | — | 1898 |
Page 1 of 1
How this list is built
A name “peaked” in 1898 when that year holds its best-ever position in the national rankings — rank, not raw count, because raw counts track how many babies were born and would pile every “peak” into the boom years. To qualify, a name must have reached the top 1,000 at its height and have at least 500 all-time applications. Lists are ordered by that peak rank.
Ranks come from U.S. births, counted separately for girls and boys. “Unranked” today means fewer than 5 applications in the latest year — uncommon, never invalid.
