Most Popular Baby Names Of 1898
The 100 most-used girls’ and boys’ names among U.S. births in 1898 — 381,432 recorded births in total that year.
Girls’ names
- 1Mary14,4065.6%
- 2Anna5,7732.2%
- 3Helen5,2302.0%
- 4Margaret4,6961.8%
- 5Ruth4,2491.6%
- 6Florence3,7901.5%
- 7Elizabeth3,6591.4%
- 8Ethel3,5311.4%
- 9Marie3,4351.3%
- 10Lillian3,0611.2%
- 11Alice2,8461.1%
- 12Edna2,8131.1%
- 13Emma2,7881.1%
- 14Clara2,7311.1%
- 15Grace2,7261.1%
- 16Bessie2,6471.0%
- 17Bertha2,6421.0%
- 18Annie2,4701.0%
- 19Hazel2,4390.9%
- 20Rose2,4360.9%
- 21Minnie2,4090.9%
- 22Frances2,3790.9%
- 23Mabel2,3310.9%
- 24Gertrude2,3020.9%
- 25Martha2,1840.8%
- 26Pearl2,1580.8%
- 27Gladys2,1360.8%
- 28Mildred2,1010.8%
- 29Ida2,0900.8%
- 30Myrtle2,0900.8%
- 31Esther2,0470.8%
- 32Edith1,9810.8%
- 33Elsie1,9190.7%
- 34Irene1,9020.7%
- 35Eva1,8230.7%
- 36Nellie1,8100.7%
- 37Sarah1,8000.7%
- 38Laura1,7680.7%
- 39Ella1,7150.7%
- 40Agnes1,7080.7%
- 41Catherine1,7050.7%
- 42Louise1,6930.7%
- 43Dorothy1,6710.6%
- 44Lillie1,5220.6%
- 45Julia1,4620.6%
- 46Josephine1,4250.6%
- 47Carrie1,3710.5%
- 48Hattie1,3280.5%
- 49Lena1,3200.5%
- 50Mattie1,3140.5%
- 51Cora1,3040.5%
- 52Alma1,2990.5%
- 53Viola1,2720.5%
- 54Blanche1,2690.5%
- 55Jessie1,2440.5%
- 56Mae1,2390.5%
- 57Jennie1,1940.5%
- 58Ruby1,1910.5%
- 59Lucy1,1440.4%
- 60Beatrice1,1220.4%
- 61Fannie1,0850.4%
- 62Marion1,0850.4%
- 63Mamie1,0840.4%
- 64Lula1,0690.4%
- 65Stella1,0620.4%
- 66Ada1,0220.4%
- 67Maude1,0090.4%
- 68Dora9290.4%
- 69Katherine9140.4%
- 70Pauline9000.3%
- 71Willie8780.3%
- 72Maggie8760.3%
- 73Vera8760.3%
- 74Nora8680.3%
- 75Rosa8410.3%
- 76Evelyn8360.3%
- 77Sadie8080.3%
- 78Virginia8010.3%
- 79Marguerite8000.3%
- 80Lucille7950.3%
- 81Ellen7860.3%
- 82Beulah7830.3%
- 83Effie7140.3%
- 84Daisy7120.3%
- 85Susie7020.3%
- 86May6960.3%
- 87Nettie6780.3%
- 88Lydia6770.3%
- 89Kathryn6710.3%
- 90Leona6650.3%
- 91Della6560.3%
- 92Georgia6540.3%
- 93Olive6440.2%
- 94Emily6280.2%
- 95Eleanor6200.2%
- 96Bernice6190.2%
- 97Hilda6100.2%
- 98Flora6070.2%
- 99Thelma6050.2%
- 100Sallie5980.2%
Boys’ names
- 1John8,1596.7%
- 2William7,4006.0%
- 3James5,3214.3%
- 4George4,8534.0%
- 5Charles3,5572.9%
- 6Joseph3,1712.6%
- 7Robert2,9322.4%
- 8Frank2,9252.4%
- 9Edward2,3371.9%
- 10Thomas2,1611.8%
- 11Henry2,1451.7%
- 12Harry2,1291.7%
- 13Walter2,0021.6%
- 14Arthur1,6191.3%
- 15Fred1,4471.2%
- 16Albert1,4171.2%
- 17Clarence1,3261.1%
- 18Willie1,1340.9%
- 19Dewey1,1150.9%
- 20Roy1,0490.9%
- 21Paul9910.8%
- 22Harold9630.8%
- 23Raymond9290.8%
- 24Carl9190.7%
- 25Earl8830.7%
- 26Richard8710.7%
- 27Louis8610.7%
- 28Ernest8390.7%
- 29Joe8270.7%
- 30David8150.7%
- 31Ralph8030.7%
- 32Samuel7490.6%
- 33Charlie7280.6%
- 34Herbert7160.6%
- 35Howard7060.6%
- 36Alfred6450.5%
- 37Jack6330.5%
- 38Andrew6110.5%
- 39Leo5880.5%
- 40Elmer5830.5%
- 41Oscar5460.4%
- 42Sam5430.4%
- 43Francis5410.4%
- 44Lawrence5330.4%
- 45Daniel5230.4%
- 46Lee4980.4%
- 47Jesse4760.4%
- 48Will4750.4%
- 49Eugene4730.4%
- 50Herman4670.4%
- 51Floyd4340.4%
- 52Michael4340.4%
- 53Leonard4210.3%
- 54Peter4090.3%
- 55Benjamin4050.3%
- 56Ray3940.3%
- 57Edwin3910.3%
- 58Clyde3830.3%
- 59Claude3710.3%
- 60Frederick3680.3%
- 61Russell3590.3%
- 62Lewis3520.3%
- 63Martin3390.3%
- 64Tom3370.3%
- 65Anthony3250.3%
- 66Chester3210.3%
- 67Clifford3170.3%
- 68Leroy3150.3%
- 69Ben3100.3%
- 70Lester2980.2%
- 71Stanley2950.2%
- 72Edgar2850.2%
- 73Bernard2840.2%
- 74Harvey2840.2%
- 75Theodore2810.2%
- 76Luther2750.2%
- 77Jim2690.2%
- 78Jessie2670.2%
- 79Lloyd2650.2%
- 80Otto2590.2%
- 81Eddie2560.2%
- 82Jacob2560.2%
- 83Leon2510.2%
- 84Hugh2500.2%
- 85Homer2460.2%
- 86Philip2440.2%
- 87Cecil2430.2%
- 88Donald2380.2%
- 89Ed2280.2%
- 90Leslie2280.2%
- 91Milton2250.2%
- 92Archie2220.2%
- 93Patrick2190.2%
- 94Guy2150.2%
- 95Everett2120.2%
- 96Norman2070.2%
- 97Victor2050.2%
- 98Ira1950.2%
- 99Stephen1950.2%
- 100Kenneth1910.2%
Percentages are each name’s share of all 1898 applications for that sex — a useful reminder of how much more concentrated naming used to be. In 1880 the top girls’ name alone accounted for several percent of all girls; today the #1 name is well under one percent.
Counts are based on U.S. births and are tracked separately for girls and boys. Names used fewer than 5 times in a year aren’t published for that year, so totals here are a floor — the shortfall is largest in the sparse early years.