Most Popular Baby Names Of 1899
The 100 most-used girls’ and boys’ names among U.S. births in 1899 — 339,215 recorded births in total that year.
Girls’ names
- 1Mary13,1725.7%
- 2Anna5,1152.2%
- 3Helen5,0482.2%
- 4Margaret4,2491.8%
- 5Ruth3,9121.7%
- 6Florence3,3141.4%
- 7Elizabeth3,2871.4%
- 8Marie3,1561.4%
- 9Ethel2,9991.3%
- 10Lillian2,7031.2%
- 11Edna2,5341.1%
- 12Alice2,5231.1%
- 13Emma2,4451.0%
- 14Clara2,4411.0%
- 15Grace2,3531.0%
- 16Bertha2,2941.0%
- 17Mildred2,2911.0%
- 18Annie2,2891.0%
- 19Bessie2,2801.0%
- 20Gladys2,2281.0%
- 21Rose2,1970.9%
- 22Mabel2,1270.9%
- 23Gertrude2,1100.9%
- 24Frances2,0580.9%
- 25Minnie2,0360.9%
- 26Hazel2,0330.9%
- 27Pearl1,9990.9%
- 28Martha1,9070.8%
- 29Esther1,8230.8%
- 30Myrtle1,8210.8%
- 31Ida1,8040.8%
- 32Edith1,7940.8%
- 33Elsie1,7060.7%
- 34Irene1,7030.7%
- 35Dorothy1,6870.7%
- 36Catherine1,6280.7%
- 37Agnes1,6110.7%
- 38Sarah1,5870.7%
- 39Eva1,5820.7%
- 40Louise1,5360.7%
- 41Nellie1,5100.6%
- 42Ella1,5020.6%
- 43Laura1,4720.6%
- 44Josephine1,3880.6%
- 45Lillie1,3500.6%
- 46Carrie1,3460.6%
- 47Julia1,2970.6%
- 48Mattie1,1710.5%
- 49Lena1,1590.5%
- 50Viola1,1560.5%
- 51Alma1,1460.5%
- 52Ruby1,1030.5%
- 53Hattie1,0870.5%
- 54Jessie1,0810.5%
- 55Blanche1,0630.5%
- 56Beatrice1,0610.5%
- 57Jennie1,0610.5%
- 58Cora1,0560.5%
- 59Mae1,0350.4%
- 60Lucy1,0180.4%
- 61Ada9840.4%
- 62Stella9750.4%
- 63Marion9730.4%
- 64Mamie9660.4%
- 65Katherine9420.4%
- 66Maude9080.4%
- 67Lula8940.4%
- 68Fannie8860.4%
- 69Vera8640.4%
- 70Maggie8140.3%
- 71Lucille8120.3%
- 72Pauline8110.3%
- 73Willie8060.3%
- 74Evelyn8020.3%
- 75Virginia7760.3%
- 76Beulah7700.3%
- 77Rosa7650.3%
- 78Thelma7360.3%
- 79Dora7180.3%
- 80Nora7090.3%
- 81Ellen7080.3%
- 82Sadie7050.3%
- 83Marguerite6930.3%
- 84Leona6650.3%
- 85Daisy6600.3%
- 86Susie6220.3%
- 87Hilda6210.3%
- 88Kathryn6210.3%
- 89Nettie6110.3%
- 90Effie5970.3%
- 91Della5950.3%
- 92Ann5860.3%
- 93Lottie5840.3%
- 94Eleanor5750.2%
- 95May5710.2%
- 96Emily5690.2%
- 97Lydia5660.2%
- 98Olive5650.2%
- 99Georgia5530.2%
- 100Sallie5440.2%
Boys’ names
- 1John6,9906.6%
- 2William6,0865.7%
- 3James4,5974.3%
- 4George4,0183.8%
- 5Charles3,1473.0%
- 6Joseph2,6792.5%
- 7Robert2,6092.5%
- 8Frank2,5502.4%
- 9Edward1,9011.8%
- 10Henry1,8311.7%
- 11Thomas1,8111.7%
- 12Walter1,7501.6%
- 13Harry1,7321.6%
- 14Arthur1,3571.3%
- 15Albert1,2101.1%
- 16Fred1,1821.1%
- 17Clarence1,1391.1%
- 18Willie1,0881.0%
- 19Harold9140.9%
- 20Roy9120.9%
- 21Paul8850.8%
- 22Raymond8690.8%
- 23Earl8210.8%
- 24Joe7800.7%
- 25Carl7740.7%
- 26Louis7700.7%
- 27Ernest7440.7%
- 28Richard7440.7%
- 29Ralph7420.7%
- 30Samuel7040.7%
- 31Charlie6780.6%
- 32David6460.6%
- 33Herbert5900.6%
- 34Howard5890.6%
- 35Jack5820.5%
- 36Andrew5780.5%
- 37Elmer5140.5%
- 38Francis5010.5%
- 39Dewey4990.5%
- 40Lawrence4970.5%
- 41Alfred4960.5%
- 42Daniel4850.5%
- 43Leo4820.5%
- 44Sam4690.4%
- 45Eugene4490.4%
- 46Oscar4470.4%
- 47Jesse4230.4%
- 48Will4140.4%
- 49Herman4130.4%
- 50Lee3880.4%
- 51Michael3750.4%
- 52Floyd3560.3%
- 53Peter3540.3%
- 54Lewis3520.3%
- 55Frederick3500.3%
- 56Russell3380.3%
- 57Benjamin3350.3%
- 58Clyde3300.3%
- 59Edwin3290.3%
- 60Leonard3210.3%
- 61Ray3150.3%
- 62Clifford2970.3%
- 63Claude2930.3%
- 64Anthony2910.3%
- 65Lester2900.3%
- 66Chester2880.3%
- 67Tom2880.3%
- 68Lloyd2870.3%
- 69Leroy2690.3%
- 70Jessie2610.2%
- 71Jim2610.2%
- 72Martin2600.2%
- 73Ben2590.2%
- 74Donald2580.2%
- 75Eddie2580.2%
- 76Stanley2580.2%
- 77Cecil2560.2%
- 78Theodore2520.2%
- 79Harvey2510.2%
- 80Edgar2490.2%
- 81Luther2480.2%
- 82Homer2390.2%
- 83Norman2230.2%
- 84Philip2230.2%
- 85Bernard2220.2%
- 86Patrick2210.2%
- 87Kenneth2140.2%
- 88Hugh2090.2%
- 89Milton2070.2%
- 90Guy2000.2%
- 91Allen1910.2%
- 92Jacob1890.2%
- 93Leon1880.2%
- 94Otis1850.2%
- 95Everett1810.2%
- 96Leslie1810.2%
- 97Alexander1780.2%
- 98Stephen1780.2%
- 99Archie1770.2%
- 100Victor1750.2%
Percentages are each name’s share of all 1899 applications for that sex — a useful reminder of how much more concentrated naming used to be. In 1880 the top girls’ name alone accounted for several percent of all girls; today the #1 name is well under one percent.
Counts are based on U.S. births and are tracked separately for girls and boys. Names used fewer than 5 times in a year aren’t published for that year, so totals here are a floor — the shortfall is largest in the sparse early years.