Most Popular Baby Names In Kentucky
The 100 most-used girls' and boys' names among recorded births from Kentucky, 2016–2025 — 378,651 applications in that window. Below them: the names Kentucky uses far more than the rest of the country.
Girls’ names
- 1Emma2,2261.3%
- 2Olivia2,0701.2%
- 3Amelia2,0501.2%
- 4Ava1,9591.1%
- 5Harper1,9481.1%
- 6Charlotte1,7361.0%
- 7Sophia1,5340.9%
- 8Evelyn1,4440.8%
- 9Isabella1,4020.8%
- 10Ella1,2650.7%
- 11Paisley1,2580.7%
- 12Willow1,2500.7%
- 13Elizabeth1,2190.7%
- 14Mia1,1780.7%
- 15Avery1,1670.7%
- 16Eleanor1,1640.7%
- 17Ellie1,1550.7%
- 18Abigail1,0790.6%
- 19Scarlett1,0500.6%
- 20Lillian1,0110.6%
- 21Layla1,0000.6%
- 22Addison9850.6%
- 23Caroline9590.6%
- 24Nora9270.5%
- 25Lily9170.5%
- 26Riley9020.5%
- 27Hazel8750.5%
- 28Nova8680.5%
- 29Ivy8350.5%
- 30Kinsley8280.5%
- 31Sadie8210.5%
- 32Raelynn8200.5%
- 33Chloe8110.5%
- 34Emily7850.5%
- 35Aurora7840.5%
- 36Stella7700.4%
- 37Madison7650.4%
- 38Zoey7630.4%
- 39Luna7530.4%
- 40Lucy7390.4%
- 41Violet7330.4%
- 42Adalynn6980.4%
- 43Penelope6940.4%
- 44Hadley6840.4%
- 45Everly6730.4%
- 46Anna6710.4%
- 47Aria6680.4%
- 48Lainey6680.4%
- 49Piper6620.4%
- 50Aubrey6570.4%
- 51Hannah6570.4%
- 52Kennedy6390.4%
- 53Serenity6360.4%
- 54Everleigh6340.4%
- 55Lydia6310.4%
- 56Josie6020.3%
- 57Madelyn6020.3%
- 58Brooklyn5900.3%
- 59Delilah5760.3%
- 60Rylee5730.3%
- 61Natalie5690.3%
- 62Naomi5630.3%
- 63Emery5610.3%
- 64Audrey5590.3%
- 65Mila5580.3%
- 66Cora5560.3%
- 67Ruby5460.3%
- 68Nevaeh5440.3%
- 69Mary5380.3%
- 70Grace5320.3%
- 71Emersyn5280.3%
- 72Eden5170.3%
- 73Skylar5170.3%
- 74Claire5050.3%
- 75Isla5040.3%
- 76Oaklynn4940.3%
- 77Aubree4880.3%
- 78Eliza4740.3%
- 79Sofia4720.3%
- 80Savannah4620.3%
- 81Autumn4570.3%
- 82Clara4570.3%
- 83Millie4420.3%
- 84Adalyn4410.3%
- 85Lyla4280.2%
- 86Blakely4260.2%
- 87Adeline4250.2%
- 88Reagan4250.2%
- 89Sarah4250.2%
- 90Sophie4250.2%
- 91Alice4230.2%
- 92Josephine4230.2%
- 93Lilly4210.2%
- 94Magnolia4190.2%
- 95Peyton4140.2%
- 96Victoria4130.2%
- 97Allison4080.2%
- 98Iris4040.2%
- 99Zoe4020.2%
- 100Charlie4010.2%
Boys’ names
- 1Liam2,6531.3%
- 2William2,4631.2%
- 3Noah2,3401.1%
- 4Elijah2,3101.1%
- 5Oliver2,2251.1%
- 6James2,1841.1%
- 7Grayson1,8470.9%
- 8Levi1,7600.9%
- 9Henry1,6780.8%
- 10Waylon1,6580.8%
- 11Hudson1,6430.8%
- 12Lincoln1,6310.8%
- 13Jackson1,6210.8%
- 14John1,6150.8%
- 15Wyatt1,5930.8%
- 16Lucas1,5420.8%
- 17Samuel1,5160.7%
- 18Carter1,5150.7%
- 19Asher1,5110.7%
- 20Mason1,4650.7%
- 21Benjamin1,4470.7%
- 22Owen1,4170.7%
- 23Easton1,3420.7%
- 24Jaxon1,3160.6%
- 25Maverick1,3030.6%
- 26Colton1,2800.6%
- 27Michael1,2300.6%
- 28Theodore1,1720.6%
- 29Joseph1,1700.6%
- 30Gabriel1,1120.5%
- 31Luke1,1070.5%
- 32Logan1,0880.5%
- 33Alexander1,0840.5%
- 34Cooper1,0800.5%
- 35Jacob1,0680.5%
- 36Carson1,0630.5%
- 37Jack1,0620.5%
- 38Silas1,0590.5%
- 39Charles1,0560.5%
- 40David1,0220.5%
- 41Hunter1,0100.5%
- 42Weston9950.5%
- 43Aiden9910.5%
- 44Daniel9580.5%
- 45Ezra9550.5%
- 46Sawyer9490.5%
- 47Thomas9450.5%
- 48Bentley9440.5%
- 49Ethan9250.5%
- 50Matthew9210.4%
- 51Greyson8720.4%
- 52Isaiah8680.4%
- 53Braxton8660.4%
- 54Christopher8560.4%
- 55Nolan8420.4%
- 56Landon8400.4%
- 57Andrew8280.4%
- 58Isaac8210.4%
- 59Parker8140.4%
- 60Eli8130.4%
- 61Jaxson7970.4%
- 62Joshua7610.4%
- 63Caleb7460.4%
- 64Bryson7320.4%
- 65Beau7270.4%
- 66Kingston7170.4%
- 67Walker7130.3%
- 68Bennett7010.3%
- 69Dylan6930.3%
- 70Robert6930.3%
- 71Ryder6870.3%
- 72Connor6830.3%
- 73Jayden6800.3%
- 74Sebastian6630.3%
- 75Leo6610.3%
- 76Everett6490.3%
- 77Xavier6480.3%
- 78Cameron6440.3%
- 79Miles6440.3%
- 80Harrison6410.3%
- 81Elias6400.3%
- 82Jace6400.3%
- 83Jasper6380.3%
- 84River6380.3%
- 85Ryker6280.3%
- 86Josiah6260.3%
- 87Dawson6240.3%
- 88Roman6180.3%
- 89Anthony6090.3%
- 90Brooks6040.3%
- 91Jameson6040.3%
- 92Jonathan5980.3%
- 93Jeremiah5970.3%
- 94Axel5950.3%
- 95Rowan5950.3%
- 96Brayden5890.3%
- 97Brantley5860.3%
- 98Kayden5860.3%
- 99Hayden5670.3%
- 100Tucker5670.3%
Kentucky's signature names
Names used at least 2× as often in Kentucky as across all states combined, 2016–2025. The multiple compares Kentucky's share of listed births with the same share pooled across every state — the closest thing to "how Kentucky does it differently" the data can support.
Girls’ names
- Blakelynn7.9× · 56 recorded
- Anniston6.8× · 131 recorded
- Lakyn6.7× · 63 recorded
- Rayleigh6.2× · 95 recorded
- Annistyn6.2× · 51 recorded
- Raylynn5.8× · 119 recorded
- Raylee5.6× · 132 recorded
- Addalynn5.3× · 62 recorded
- Briley5.1× · 71 recorded
- Harlyn4.7× · 58 recorded
- Preslee4.7× · 58 recorded
- Laken4.6× · 76 recorded
- Emberlyn4.6× · 69 recorded
- Maylee4.5× · 106 recorded
- Memphis4.3× · 63 recorded
- Whitley4.2× · 152 recorded
- Hadleigh4.2× · 118 recorded
- Madalynn4.2× · 107 recorded
- Emberlynn4.1× · 101 recorded
- Wrenleigh4.1× · 59 recorded
- Dixie4× · 85 recorded
- Kaylynn4× · 80 recorded
- Wrenlee3.9× · 138 recorded
- Braylee3.9× · 123 recorded
- Mattie3.8× · 97 recorded
Boys’ names
- Kenton8.5× · 66 recorded
- Brantlee6.4× · 66 recorded
- Bentlee5.8× · 118 recorded
- Kolson5.7× · 103 recorded
- Brentley5.3× · 97 recorded
- Raylan5.2× · 254 recorded
- Chevy5.2× · 52 recorded
- Korbyn4.5× · 71 recorded
- Gatlin4.4× · 135 recorded
- Branson4.1× · 115 recorded
- Cashton4× · 70 recorded
- Houston3.9× · 163 recorded
- Memphis3.8× · 284 recorded
- Harlan3.8× · 161 recorded
- Draven3.7× · 69 recorded
- Briar3.6× · 138 recorded
- Canaan3.6× · 99 recorded
- Jenson3.5× · 50 recorded
- Jaxtyn3.4× · 68 recorded
- Skylar3.4× · 59 recorded
- Kolton3.3× · 257 recorded
- Westyn3.3× · 73 recorded
- Waylon3.2× · 1,658 recorded
- Kashton3.2× · 275 recorded
- Boone3.2× · 184 recorded
All-time favorites, 1910–2025
The most-used names across everything Kentucky has recorded since 1910 — a very different list, dominated by the high-birth, low-variety decades of the mid-century.
Girls’ names
- 1Mary103,6993.7%
- 2Betty33,8251.2%
- 3Linda30,8231.1%
- 4Elizabeth29,8831.1%
- 5Patricia27,4221.0%
- 6Barbara26,6180.9%
- 7Anna25,0440.9%
- 8Dorothy24,1140.9%
- 9Jennifer22,5690.8%
- 10Margaret22,5330.8%
- 11Sarah21,0760.7%
- 12Brenda19,9250.7%
- 13Donna18,7980.7%
- 14Martha18,3200.6%
- 15Helen18,0770.6%
- 16Virginia17,8230.6%
- 17Nancy17,7410.6%
- 18Rebecca17,5130.6%
- 19Ruth17,2570.6%
- 20Lisa17,0550.6%
- 21Kimberly16,9400.6%
- 22Jessica16,8660.6%
- 23Shirley16,3130.6%
- 24Amanda16,2980.6%
- 25Angela15,4080.5%
- 26Sandra15,3310.5%
- 27Carolyn15,2610.5%
- 28Ashley15,1230.5%
- 29Melissa15,0080.5%
- 30Emma14,7110.5%
- 31Joyce14,6330.5%
- 32Karen14,5900.5%
- 33Ruby14,5490.5%
- 34Deborah14,5470.5%
- 35Emily14,5090.5%
- 36Sharon14,3580.5%
- 37Wanda14,2650.5%
- 38Laura13,6760.5%
- 39Susan13,1540.5%
- 40Pamela12,8300.5%
- 41Amy12,6200.4%
- 42Judy12,1630.4%
- 43Mildred12,0590.4%
- 44Stephanie11,3890.4%
- 45Frances11,2930.4%
- 46Teresa11,1940.4%
- 47Carol10,6550.4%
- 48Evelyn10,6090.4%
- 49Doris10,6070.4%
- 50Katherine10,5920.4%
Boys’ names
- 1James145,8574.9%
- 2William106,2243.6%
- 3John83,7462.8%
- 4Robert80,9272.7%
- 5Charles69,7292.3%
- 6Michael63,2552.1%
- 7David61,3772.1%
- 8Joseph40,3091.3%
- 9Thomas37,0301.2%
- 10Christopher35,1101.2%
- 11Richard30,8831.0%
- 12Donald30,0011.0%
- 13Paul28,3530.9%
- 14Kenneth27,6570.9%
- 15George27,4570.9%
- 16Larry24,9230.8%
- 17Joshua22,9510.8%
- 18Timothy22,5410.8%
- 19Matthew22,4100.8%
- 20Gary21,3670.7%
- 21Daniel21,0430.7%
- 22Billy20,7280.7%
- 23Mark20,3740.7%
- 24Jerry19,4290.7%
- 25Ronald19,0820.6%
- 26Steven18,9870.6%
- 27Edward18,3420.6%
- 28Anthony18,1480.6%
- 29Jason17,8430.6%
- 30Jacob17,0950.6%
- 31Bobby16,8830.6%
- 32Andrew16,1580.5%
- 33Brian15,7440.5%
- 34Kevin15,2850.5%
- 35Harold15,2470.5%
- 36Jeffrey15,2130.5%
- 37Stephen14,9580.5%
- 38Samuel14,0900.5%
- 39Roy14,0010.5%
- 40Brandon13,9540.5%
- 41Raymond13,8970.5%
- 42Carl13,8050.5%
- 43Jonathan13,5170.5%
- 44Henry13,1430.4%
- 45Gregory13,1270.4%
- 46Justin12,9480.4%
- 47Terry12,6940.4%
- 48Roger12,6570.4%
- 49Jack12,3670.4%
- 50Danny12,1710.4%
State data starts in 1910 (national data goes back to 1880) and is censored per state and year: a name needs 5 uses in Kentucky in a year to appear at all. That censoring means state counts never sum to the national total, and it bites hardest on uncommon names in small states.
Counts are based on U.S. births and are tracked separately for girls and boys. Names used fewer than 5 times in a year aren’t published for that year, so totals here are a floor — the shortfall is largest in the sparse early years.