Most Popular Baby Names Of 1883
The 100 most-used girls’ and boys’ names among U.S. births in 1883 — 216,938 recorded births in total that year.
Girls’ names
- 1Mary8,0127.1%
- 2Anna3,3062.9%
- 3Emma2,3672.1%
- 4Elizabeth2,2552.0%
- 5Minnie2,0351.8%
- 6Margaret1,8811.7%
- 7Bertha1,6811.5%
- 8Ida1,6341.5%
- 9Annie1,5891.4%
- 10Clara1,5481.4%
- 11Alice1,4881.3%
- 12Sarah1,3591.2%
- 13Grace1,3071.2%
- 14Florence1,2981.2%
- 15Martha1,2551.1%
- 16Ella1,2511.1%
- 17Nellie1,2461.1%
- 18Bessie1,2411.1%
- 19Laura1,1831.1%
- 20Ethel1,1321.0%
- 21Carrie1,1081.0%
- 22Maude1,0961.0%
- 23Mabel1,0861.0%
- 24Cora1,0811.0%
- 25Gertrude9230.8%
- 26Lillian9070.8%
- 27Jennie9040.8%
- 28Hattie8950.8%
- 29Pearl8860.8%
- 30Mattie8830.8%
- 31Edith8810.8%
- 32Eva8790.8%
- 33Rose8770.8%
- 34Julia8750.8%
- 35Helen8620.8%
- 36Catherine8530.8%
- 37Myrtle8510.8%
- 38Louise8470.8%
- 39Lillie8370.7%
- 40Jessie8340.7%
- 41Edna8230.7%
- 42Lena8000.7%
- 43Lula7900.7%
- 44Ada7780.7%
- 45Frances7100.6%
- 46Josephine6970.6%
- 47Fannie6960.6%
- 48Lucy6630.6%
- 49Maggie6630.6%
- 50Daisy6590.6%
- 51Dora6400.6%
- 52Agnes6230.6%
- 53Marie6220.6%
- 54Blanche6100.5%
- 55Nora5890.5%
- 56Katherine5830.5%
- 57May5320.5%
- 58Mamie5310.5%
- 59Stella5290.5%
- 60Effie5070.5%
- 61Rosa5070.5%
- 62Ellen5000.4%
- 63Lizzie4960.4%
- 64Nettie4940.4%
- 65Elsie4790.4%
- 66Della4530.4%
- 67Susie4360.4%
- 68Maud4250.4%
- 69Sadie4250.4%
- 70Mae4230.4%
- 71Nancy4120.4%
- 72Sallie4090.4%
- 73Flora3870.3%
- 74Ruth3870.3%
- 75Lydia3780.3%
- 76Lottie3720.3%
- 77Addie3620.3%
- 78Katie3610.3%
- 79Alma3590.3%
- 80Etta3520.3%
- 81Emily3420.3%
- 82Harriet3410.3%
- 83Viola3310.3%
- 84Georgia3250.3%
- 85Susan3220.3%
- 86Caroline3210.3%
- 87Nannie3050.3%
- 88Lulu3020.3%
- 89Mollie3010.3%
- 90Kate2940.3%
- 91Olive2940.3%
- 92Charlotte2910.3%
- 93Kathryn2900.3%
- 94Amanda2870.3%
- 95Eliza2740.2%
- 96Willie2640.2%
- 97Amelia2620.2%
- 98Belle2620.2%
- 99Esther2600.2%
- 100Irene2600.2%
Boys’ names
- 1John8,8948.5%
- 2William8,3878.0%
- 3James5,2235.0%
- 4Charles4,8264.6%
- 5George4,7364.5%
- 6Frank2,9862.9%
- 7Joseph2,5152.4%
- 8Henry2,3832.3%
- 9Robert2,3342.2%
- 10Thomas2,3162.2%
- 11Edward2,2502.2%
- 12Harry2,1102.0%
- 13Walter1,7051.6%
- 14Arthur1,5911.5%
- 15Fred1,5021.4%
- 16Albert1,4961.4%
- 17Samuel9370.9%
- 18Clarence8370.8%
- 19Louis7960.8%
- 20David7340.7%
- 21Richard6490.6%
- 22Charlie6430.6%
- 23Ernest6410.6%
- 24Andrew6230.6%
- 25Daniel6150.6%
- 26Joe6070.6%
- 27Oscar6070.6%
- 28Jesse5840.6%
- 29Will5760.6%
- 30Roy5560.5%
- 31Benjamin5080.5%
- 32Carl4800.5%
- 33Sam4760.5%
- 34Willie4740.5%
- 35Alfred4570.4%
- 36Peter4500.4%
- 37Frederick4380.4%
- 38Lewis4310.4%
- 39Howard4290.4%
- 40Elmer4230.4%
- 41Herbert4220.4%
- 42Earl3890.4%
- 43Lee3880.4%
- 44Tom3860.4%
- 45Ralph3850.4%
- 46Martin3770.4%
- 47Herman3590.3%
- 48Paul3580.3%
- 49Jacob3560.3%
- 50Clyde3360.3%
- 51Eugene3250.3%
- 52Jim3220.3%
- 53Harvey3180.3%
- 54Claude3150.3%
- 55Michael3070.3%
- 56Ben3060.3%
- 57Edwin2990.3%
- 58Edgar2920.3%
- 59Chester2900.3%
- 60Francis2850.3%
- 61Lawrence2820.3%
- 62Bert2730.3%
- 63Charley2540.2%
- 64Ed2470.2%
- 65Jack2420.2%
- 66Otto2400.2%
- 67Ira2390.2%
- 68Raymond2330.2%
- 69Luther2290.2%
- 70Isaac2270.2%
- 71Guy2240.2%
- 72Oliver2190.2%
- 73Floyd2170.2%
- 74Hugh2150.2%
- 75Patrick2130.2%
- 76Homer2100.2%
- 77August2090.2%
- 78Ray2020.2%
- 79Leonard2000.2%
- 80Alexander1870.2%
- 81Theodore1850.2%
- 82Allen1750.2%
- 83Horace1670.2%
- 84Archie1660.2%
- 85Philip1660.2%
- 86Sidney1650.2%
- 87Marion1630.2%
- 88Julius1600.2%
- 89Jessie1510.1%
- 90Milton1490.1%
- 91Warren1460.1%
- 92Anthony1430.1%
- 93Everett1430.1%
- 94Leroy1430.1%
- 95Leo1420.1%
- 96Bernard1410.1%
- 97Leon1400.1%
- 98Stephen1400.1%
- 99Emil1390.1%
- 100Clifford1380.1%
Percentages are each name’s share of all 1883 applications for that sex — a useful reminder of how much more concentrated naming used to be. In 1880 the top girls’ name alone accounted for several percent of all girls; today the #1 name is well under one percent.
Counts are based on U.S. births and are tracked separately for girls and boys. Names used fewer than 5 times in a year aren’t published for that year, so totals here are a floor — the shortfall is largest in the sparse early years.