Most Popular Baby Names Of 1882
The 100 most-used girls’ and boys’ names among U.S. births in 1882 — 221,526 recorded births in total that year.
Girls’ names
- 1Mary8,1487.6%
- 2Anna3,1432.9%
- 3Emma2,3032.1%
- 4Elizabeth2,1862.0%
- 5Minnie2,0041.9%
- 6Margaret1,8211.7%
- 7Ida1,6731.6%
- 8Alice1,5421.4%
- 9Bertha1,5081.4%
- 10Annie1,4921.4%
- 11Clara1,4901.4%
- 12Sarah1,4101.3%
- 13Florence1,3221.2%
- 14Martha1,2291.1%
- 15Ella1,2061.1%
- 16Grace1,1951.1%
- 17Laura1,1511.1%
- 18Bessie1,1441.1%
- 19Nellie1,1381.1%
- 20Maude1,0891.0%
- 21Cora1,0761.0%
- 22Carrie1,0371.0%
- 23Mabel9970.9%
- 24Ethel9890.9%
- 25Mattie9660.9%
- 26Gertrude9390.9%
- 27Jennie9340.9%
- 28Rose8860.8%
- 29Edith8760.8%
- 30Hattie8590.8%
- 31Helen8380.8%
- 32Lillian8300.8%
- 33Pearl8240.8%
- 34Louise8130.8%
- 35Julia8110.8%
- 36Lillie8100.8%
- 37Jessie8060.7%
- 38Myrtle8030.7%
- 39Edna7830.7%
- 40Lula7800.7%
- 41Eva7650.7%
- 42Catherine7260.7%
- 43Lena6970.6%
- 44Ada6890.6%
- 45Frances6810.6%
- 46Lucy6730.6%
- 47Fannie6500.6%
- 48Daisy6480.6%
- 49Josephine6380.6%
- 50Maggie6270.6%
- 51Dora5940.6%
- 52Katherine5910.5%
- 53Marie5910.5%
- 54Agnes5650.5%
- 55Effie5610.5%
- 56Blanche5470.5%
- 57Rosa5420.5%
- 58Nora5390.5%
- 59May5100.5%
- 60Mamie5080.5%
- 61Stella5060.5%
- 62Lizzie4950.5%
- 63Sallie4870.5%
- 64Ellen4520.4%
- 65Elsie4480.4%
- 66Della4470.4%
- 67Nancy4390.4%
- 68Nettie4390.4%
- 69Maud4320.4%
- 70Susie4120.4%
- 71Mae4060.4%
- 72Sadie3910.4%
- 73Flora3800.4%
- 74Alma3680.3%
- 75Etta3520.3%
- 76Lydia3420.3%
- 77Addie3410.3%
- 78Katie3270.3%
- 79Susan3260.3%
- 80Ruth3230.3%
- 81Georgia3200.3%
- 82Lottie3190.3%
- 83Viola3100.3%
- 84Mollie3050.3%
- 85Caroline3040.3%
- 86Nannie2990.3%
- 87Kate2930.3%
- 88Olive2910.3%
- 89Willie2910.3%
- 90Harriet2890.3%
- 91Amanda2880.3%
- 92Eliza2800.3%
- 93Lulu2790.3%
- 94Virginia2740.3%
- 95Emily2720.3%
- 96Kathryn2720.3%
- 97Esther2660.2%
- 98Belle2640.2%
- 99Rebecca2590.2%
- 100Charlotte2570.2%
Boys’ names
- 1John9,5578.4%
- 2William9,2988.2%
- 3James5,8925.2%
- 4George5,1934.6%
- 5Charles5,0914.5%
- 6Frank3,1762.8%
- 7Joseph2,6702.3%
- 8Thomas2,6102.3%
- 9Henry2,5792.3%
- 10Robert2,5002.2%
- 11Edward2,4772.2%
- 12Harry2,2322.0%
- 13Walter1,8051.6%
- 14Arthur1,6861.5%
- 15Fred1,6411.4%
- 16Albert1,4991.3%
- 17Samuel1,0030.9%
- 18Louis8520.7%
- 19David8380.7%
- 20Clarence8370.7%
- 21Charlie7530.7%
- 22Richard7460.7%
- 23Joe7390.7%
- 24Andrew6730.6%
- 25Will6660.6%
- 26Jesse6600.6%
- 27Ernest6420.6%
- 28Oscar6250.5%
- 29Daniel5940.5%
- 30Sam5550.5%
- 31Willie5410.5%
- 32Alfred5230.5%
- 33Roy5210.5%
- 34Benjamin4780.4%
- 35Carl4780.4%
- 36Peter4610.4%
- 37Frederick4570.4%
- 38Elmer4410.4%
- 39Lewis4410.4%
- 40Herbert4310.4%
- 41Lee4270.4%
- 42Howard4220.4%
- 43Ralph4070.4%
- 44Paul3970.3%
- 45Jim3960.3%
- 46Jacob3900.3%
- 47Tom3900.3%
- 48Martin3870.3%
- 49Earl3770.3%
- 50Claude3560.3%
- 51Herman3480.3%
- 52Bert3410.3%
- 53Eugene3410.3%
- 54Ed3370.3%
- 55Ben3340.3%
- 56Francis3270.3%
- 57Michael3210.3%
- 58Edgar3080.3%
- 59Edwin3050.3%
- 60Chester3000.3%
- 61Harvey3000.3%
- 62Clyde2930.3%
- 63Lawrence2870.3%
- 64Luther2840.2%
- 65Isaac2780.2%
- 66Jack2710.2%
- 67Charley2620.2%
- 68Guy2530.2%
- 69Otto2520.2%
- 70Patrick2490.2%
- 71Ira2440.2%
- 72Oliver2440.2%
- 73Hugh2390.2%
- 74August2340.2%
- 75Theodore2320.2%
- 76Floyd2310.2%
- 77Leonard2310.2%
- 78Raymond2300.2%
- 79Alexander2250.2%
- 80Allen2060.2%
- 81Stephen2010.2%
- 82Archie1950.2%
- 83Ray1950.2%
- 84Jessie1920.2%
- 85Homer1900.2%
- 86Warren1830.2%
- 87Philip1820.2%
- 88Horace1760.2%
- 89Alex1720.2%
- 90Eddie1690.1%
- 91Julius1680.1%
- 92Emil1570.1%
- 93Marion1570.1%
- 94Clifford1550.1%
- 95Milton1550.1%
- 96Leroy1520.1%
- 97Dan1500.1%
- 98Rufus1470.1%
- 99Leo1460.1%
- 100Sidney1460.1%
Percentages are each name’s share of all 1882 applications for that sex — a useful reminder of how much more concentrated naming used to be. In 1880 the top girls’ name alone accounted for several percent of all girls; today the #1 name is well under one percent.
Counts are based on U.S. births and are tracked separately for girls and boys. Names used fewer than 5 times in a year aren’t published for that year, so totals here are a floor — the shortfall is largest in the sparse early years.
