Most Popular Baby Names Of 1881
The 100 most-used girls’ and boys’ names among U.S. births in 1881 — 192,680 recorded births in total that year.
Girls’ names
- 1Mary6,9197.5%
- 2Anna2,6982.9%
- 3Emma2,0342.2%
- 4Elizabeth1,8522.0%
- 5Margaret1,6581.8%
- 6Minnie1,6531.8%
- 7Ida1,4391.6%
- 8Annie1,3261.4%
- 9Bertha1,3241.4%
- 10Alice1,3081.4%
- 11Clara1,2421.4%
- 12Sarah1,2261.3%
- 13Ella1,1481.2%
- 14Nellie1,0961.2%
- 15Grace1,0891.2%
- 16Florence1,0461.1%
- 17Martha1,0441.1%
- 18Cora9691.1%
- 19Laura9621.0%
- 20Carrie9581.0%
- 21Maude9231.0%
- 22Bessie9031.0%
- 23Mabel8931.0%
- 24Gertrude7910.9%
- 25Ethel7880.9%
- 26Jennie7840.9%
- 27Edith7780.8%
- 28Hattie7750.8%
- 29Mattie7540.8%
- 30Julia7370.8%
- 31Rose7340.8%
- 32Lillian7230.8%
- 33Lillie6780.7%
- 34Eva6610.7%
- 35Jessie6610.7%
- 36Lula6550.7%
- 37Myrtle6430.7%
- 38Pearl6410.7%
- 39Edna6370.7%
- 40Catherine6350.7%
- 41Ada6280.7%
- 42Louise6170.7%
- 43Helen6120.7%
- 44Lucy6110.7%
- 45Frances5860.6%
- 46Dora5850.6%
- 47Fannie5650.6%
- 48Josephine5630.6%
- 49Daisy5620.6%
- 50Lena5550.6%
- 51Maggie5320.6%
- 52Katherine5040.5%
- 53Rosa5000.5%
- 54Marie4990.5%
- 55Nora4980.5%
- 56Effie4630.5%
- 57Blanche4560.5%
- 58May4510.5%
- 59Nancy4290.5%
- 60Della4280.5%
- 61Agnes4240.5%
- 62Nettie4190.5%
- 63Sallie4160.5%
- 64Stella4160.5%
- 65Ellen4130.4%
- 66Mamie4120.4%
- 67Lizzie3960.4%
- 68Susie3670.4%
- 69Sadie3660.4%
- 70Elsie3440.4%
- 71Maud3280.4%
- 72Flora3170.3%
- 73Caroline3160.3%
- 74Etta3160.3%
- 75Mae3140.3%
- 76Lulu3130.3%
- 77Lydia2990.3%
- 78Alma2930.3%
- 79Susan2920.3%
- 80Lottie2890.3%
- 81Addie2870.3%
- 82Mollie2810.3%
- 83Katie2790.3%
- 84Ruth2750.3%
- 85Harriet2700.3%
- 86Kate2670.3%
- 87Amanda2630.3%
- 88Nannie2580.3%
- 89Georgia2560.3%
- 90Emily2440.3%
- 91Eliza2380.3%
- 92Viola2370.3%
- 93Amelia2350.3%
- 94Willie2290.2%
- 95Charlotte2270.2%
- 96Rebecca2260.2%
- 97Belle2190.2%
- 98Kathryn2180.2%
- 99Jane2160.2%
- 100Olive2110.2%
Boys’ names
- 1John8,7688.7%
- 2William8,5248.5%
- 3James5,4415.4%
- 4George4,6644.6%
- 5Charles4,6364.6%
- 6Frank2,8342.8%
- 7Joseph2,4562.4%
- 8Henry2,3392.3%
- 9Thomas2,2822.3%
- 10Edward2,1772.2%
- 11Robert2,1402.1%
- 12Harry2,0022.0%
- 13Walter1,6701.7%
- 14Arthur1,5751.6%
- 15Fred1,4181.4%
- 16Albert1,3191.3%
- 17Samuel9190.9%
- 18David7500.7%
- 19Louis7460.7%
- 20Charlie6680.7%
- 21Clarence6680.7%
- 22Richard6410.6%
- 23Joe6390.6%
- 24Andrew5880.6%
- 25Ernest5710.6%
- 26Will5500.5%
- 27Jesse5360.5%
- 28Oscar5300.5%
- 29Daniel5270.5%
- 30Willie4980.5%
- 31Benjamin4810.5%
- 32Sam4810.5%
- 33Alfred4660.5%
- 34Roy4400.4%
- 35Lewis4390.4%
- 36Frederick4330.4%
- 37Peter4280.4%
- 38Elmer3880.4%
- 39Jacob3810.4%
- 40Herbert3690.4%
- 41Carl3590.4%
- 42Howard3590.4%
- 43Tom3490.3%
- 44Lee3420.3%
- 45Ralph3290.3%
- 46Martin3270.3%
- 47Jim3230.3%
- 48Earl3140.3%
- 49Eugene3140.3%
- 50Bert3120.3%
- 51Edgar3120.3%
- 52Herman3040.3%
- 53Claude3020.3%
- 54Michael2980.3%
- 55Paul2910.3%
- 56Ben2890.3%
- 57Ira2860.3%
- 58Harvey2820.3%
- 59Chester2740.3%
- 60Edwin2740.3%
- 61Ed2720.3%
- 62Charley2660.3%
- 63Francis2590.3%
- 64Isaac2580.3%
- 65Luther2490.2%
- 66Lawrence2440.2%
- 67Oliver2380.2%
- 68Clyde2320.2%
- 69Otto2210.2%
- 70Hugh2190.2%
- 71Alexander2090.2%
- 72Leonard2060.2%
- 73Jack1970.2%
- 74Raymond1950.2%
- 75Patrick1880.2%
- 76Guy1860.2%
- 77Homer1810.2%
- 78Floyd1780.2%
- 79Theodore1780.2%
- 80Allen1720.2%
- 81August1720.2%
- 82Marion1620.2%
- 83Philip1560.2%
- 84Warren1560.2%
- 85Horace1520.2%
- 86Dan1480.1%
- 87Ray1480.1%
- 88Garfield1470.1%
- 89Stephen1470.1%
- 90Emil1450.1%
- 91Jessie1430.1%
- 92Milton1430.1%
- 93Willis1420.1%
- 94Calvin1380.1%
- 95Dave1350.1%
- 96Bernard1300.1%
- 97Julius1290.1%
- 98Leroy1290.1%
- 99Sidney1290.1%
- 100Anthony1280.1%
Percentages are each name’s share of all 1881 applications for that sex — a useful reminder of how much more concentrated naming used to be. In 1880 the top girls’ name alone accounted for several percent of all girls; today the #1 name is well under one percent.
Counts are based on U.S. births and are tracked separately for girls and boys. Names used fewer than 5 times in a year aren’t published for that year, so totals here are a floor — the shortfall is largest in the sparse early years.