Most Popular Baby Names Of 1880
The 100 most-used girls’ and boys’ names among U.S. births in 1880 — 201,479 recorded births in total that year.
Girls’ names
- 1Mary7,0657.8%
- 2Anna2,6042.9%
- 3Emma2,0032.2%
- 4Elizabeth1,9392.1%
- 5Minnie1,7461.9%
- 6Margaret1,5781.7%
- 7Ida1,4721.6%
- 8Alice1,4141.6%
- 9Bertha1,3201.5%
- 10Sarah1,2881.4%
- 11Annie1,2581.4%
- 12Clara1,2261.3%
- 13Ella1,1561.3%
- 14Florence1,0631.2%
- 15Cora1,0451.1%
- 16Martha1,0401.1%
- 17Laura1,0121.1%
- 18Nellie9951.1%
- 19Grace9821.1%
- 20Carrie9491.0%
- 21Maude8590.9%
- 22Mabel8080.9%
- 23Bessie7960.9%
- 24Jennie7930.9%
- 25Gertrude7870.9%
- 26Julia7830.9%
- 27Hattie7690.8%
- 28Edith7680.8%
- 29Mattie7040.8%
- 30Rose7000.8%
- 31Catherine6880.8%
- 32Lillian6720.7%
- 33Ada6520.7%
- 34Lillie6470.7%
- 35Helen6360.7%
- 36Jessie6350.7%
- 37Louise6350.7%
- 38Ethel6330.7%
- 39Lula6210.7%
- 40Myrtle6150.7%
- 41Eva6140.7%
- 42Frances6050.7%
- 43Lena6030.7%
- 44Lucy5900.6%
- 45Edna5880.6%
- 46Maggie5820.6%
- 47Pearl5690.6%
- 48Daisy5640.6%
- 49Fannie5600.6%
- 50Josephine5440.6%
- 51Dora5240.6%
- 52Rosa5070.6%
- 53Katherine5020.6%
- 54Agnes4730.5%
- 55Marie4710.5%
- 56Nora4710.5%
- 57May4620.5%
- 58Mamie4360.5%
- 59Blanche4270.5%
- 60Stella4140.5%
- 61Ellen4110.5%
- 62Nancy4100.5%
- 63Effie4060.4%
- 64Sallie4040.4%
- 65Nettie4030.4%
- 66Della3910.4%
- 67Lizzie3880.4%
- 68Flora3650.4%
- 69Susie3610.4%
- 70Maud3450.4%
- 71Mae3440.4%
- 72Etta3230.4%
- 73Harriet3190.4%
- 74Sadie3170.3%
- 75Caroline3060.3%
- 76Katie3030.3%
- 77Lydia3020.3%
- 78Elsie3010.3%
- 79Kate2990.3%
- 80Susan2860.3%
- 81Mollie2830.3%
- 82Alma2770.3%
- 83Addie2740.3%
- 84Georgia2590.3%
- 85Eliza2520.3%
- 86Lulu2490.3%
- 87Nannie2480.3%
- 88Lottie2450.3%
- 89Amanda2410.3%
- 90Belle2380.3%
- 91Charlotte2370.3%
- 92Rebecca2360.3%
- 93Ruth2340.3%
- 94Viola2290.3%
- 95Olive2240.2%
- 96Amelia2210.2%
- 97Hannah2210.2%
- 98Jane2150.2%
- 99Virginia2130.2%
- 100Emily2100.2%
Boys’ names
- 1John9,6558.7%
- 2William9,5328.6%
- 3James5,9275.4%
- 4Charles5,3484.8%
- 5George5,1264.6%
- 6Frank3,2422.9%
- 7Joseph2,6322.4%
- 8Thomas2,5342.3%
- 9Henry2,4442.2%
- 10Robert2,4152.2%
- 11Edward2,3642.1%
- 12Harry2,1521.9%
- 13Walter1,7551.6%
- 14Arthur1,5991.4%
- 15Fred1,5691.4%
- 16Albert1,4931.4%
- 17Samuel1,0240.9%
- 18David8690.8%
- 19Louis8280.7%
- 20Joe7310.7%
- 21Charlie7300.7%
- 22Clarence7300.7%
- 23Richard7280.7%
- 24Andrew6440.6%
- 25Daniel6430.6%
- 26Ernest6150.6%
- 27Will5880.5%
- 28Jesse5690.5%
- 29Oscar5440.5%
- 30Lewis5170.5%
- 31Peter4960.4%
- 32Benjamin4900.4%
- 33Frederick4830.4%
- 34Willie4760.4%
- 35Alfred4690.4%
- 36Sam4570.4%
- 37Roy4400.4%
- 38Herbert4240.4%
- 39Jacob4040.4%
- 40Tom3990.4%
- 41Elmer3730.3%
- 42Carl3720.3%
- 43Lee3610.3%
- 44Howard3570.3%
- 45Martin3570.3%
- 46Michael3540.3%
- 47Bert3480.3%
- 48Herman3470.3%
- 49Jim3450.3%
- 50Francis3440.3%
- 51Harvey3440.3%
- 52Earl3350.3%
- 53Eugene3280.3%
- 54Ralph3170.3%
- 55Ed3100.3%
- 56Claude3090.3%
- 57Edwin3090.3%
- 58Ben3050.3%
- 59Charley3050.3%
- 60Paul3010.3%
- 61Edgar2830.3%
- 62Isaac2740.2%
- 63Otto2710.2%
- 64Luther2600.2%
- 65Lawrence2570.2%
- 66Ira2490.2%
- 67Patrick2480.2%
- 68Guy2390.2%
- 69Oliver2340.2%
- 70Theodore2320.2%
- 71Hugh2240.2%
- 72Clyde2210.2%
- 73Alexander2110.2%
- 74August2100.2%
- 75Floyd2060.2%
- 76Homer2050.2%
- 77Jack2040.2%
- 78Leonard2000.2%
- 79Horace1990.2%
- 80Marion1890.2%
- 81Philip1860.2%
- 82Allen1840.2%
- 83Archie1830.2%
- 84Stephen1760.2%
- 85Chester1680.2%
- 86Willis1660.2%
- 87Raymond1650.1%
- 88Rufus1630.1%
- 89Warren1580.1%
- 90Jessie1540.1%
- 91Milton1490.1%
- 92Alex1470.1%
- 93Leo1470.1%
- 94Julius1430.1%
- 95Ray1420.1%
- 96Sidney1420.1%
- 97Bernard1400.1%
- 98Dan1400.1%
- 99Jerry1360.1%
- 100Calvin1340.1%
Percentages are each name’s share of all 1880 applications for that sex — a useful reminder of how much more concentrated naming used to be. In 1880 the top girls’ name alone accounted for several percent of all girls; today the #1 name is well under one percent.
Counts are based on U.S. births and are tracked separately for girls and boys. Names used fewer than 5 times in a year aren’t published for that year, so totals here are a floor — the shortfall is largest in the sparse early years.