Most Popular Baby Names Of 1893
The 100 most-used girls’ and boys’ names among U.S. births in 1893 — 325,216 recorded births in total that year.
Girls’ names
- 1Mary12,7846.0%
- 2Anna5,6952.7%
- 3Ruth3,6581.7%
- 4Margaret3,5651.7%
- 5Elizabeth3,3601.6%
- 6Helen3,2491.5%
- 7Florence3,2311.5%
- 8Ethel3,1191.5%
- 9Emma2,9681.4%
- 10Bertha2,6231.2%
- 11Clara2,5321.2%
- 12Minnie2,5101.2%
- 13Alice2,4341.1%
- 14Edna2,3781.1%
- 15Bessie2,3521.1%
- 16Grace2,3081.1%
- 17Annie2,2511.1%
- 18Ida2,2471.1%
- 19Marie2,2121.0%
- 20Lillian2,1931.0%
- 21Mabel2,1911.0%
- 22Hazel2,0521.0%
- 23Rose2,0120.9%
- 24Gertrude1,8110.9%
- 25Martha1,8050.8%
- 26Pearl1,7960.8%
- 27Nellie1,7700.8%
- 28Ella1,7600.8%
- 29Myrtle1,7590.8%
- 30Edith1,7330.8%
- 31Laura1,6830.8%
- 32Eva1,6680.8%
- 33Sarah1,6320.8%
- 34Frances1,6220.8%
- 35Elsie1,5860.7%
- 36Carrie1,4510.7%
- 37Louise1,4470.7%
- 38Agnes1,3930.7%
- 39Esther1,3820.6%
- 40Julia1,3670.6%
- 41Lillie1,3510.6%
- 42Catherine1,3360.6%
- 43Hattie1,3150.6%
- 44Cora1,3080.6%
- 45Jennie1,2730.6%
- 46Lena1,2610.6%
- 47Mattie1,2570.6%
- 48Jessie1,2160.6%
- 49Maude1,2020.6%
- 50Josephine1,1780.6%
- 51Irene1,1110.5%
- 52Blanche1,0750.5%
- 53Mae1,0710.5%
- 54Alma1,0550.5%
- 55Ada1,0510.5%
- 56Lucy1,0360.5%
- 57Lula1,0340.5%
- 58Gladys1,0170.5%
- 59Mamie1,0110.5%
- 60Mildred1,0080.5%
- 61Fannie1,0030.5%
- 62Katherine9630.5%
- 63Stella9260.4%
- 64Maggie8860.4%
- 65Dora8770.4%
- 66Viola8390.4%
- 67Nora8250.4%
- 68Dorothy8210.4%
- 69Ellen7980.4%
- 70Rosa7900.4%
- 71Ruby7690.4%
- 72Sadie7060.3%
- 73May6930.3%
- 74Effie6740.3%
- 75Nettie6680.3%
- 76Della6600.3%
- 77Willie6480.3%
- 78Susie6440.3%
- 79Marguerite6380.3%
- 80Beulah6220.3%
- 81Lydia5980.3%
- 82Olive5890.3%
- 83Lizzie5840.3%
- 84Daisy5730.3%
- 85Beatrice5640.3%
- 86Pauline5450.3%
- 87Georgia5410.3%
- 88Nancy5380.3%
- 89Flora5370.3%
- 90Kathryn5340.3%
- 91Vera5340.3%
- 92Lottie5320.2%
- 93Marion5320.2%
- 94Sallie5160.2%
- 95Emily5060.2%
- 96Katie5040.2%
- 97Virginia4980.2%
- 98Etta4860.2%
- 99Caroline4830.2%
- 100Charlotte4760.2%
Boys’ names
- 1John8,0497.2%
- 2William7,2236.4%
- 3James5,0304.5%
- 4George4,3203.8%
- 5Charles3,7233.3%
- 6Joseph2,9972.7%
- 7Frank2,9172.6%
- 8Robert2,5632.3%
- 9Edward2,3092.1%
- 10Harry2,2452.0%
- 11Henry2,1621.9%
- 12Thomas2,1571.9%
- 13Walter2,0041.8%
- 14Arthur1,6351.5%
- 15Fred1,4931.3%
- 16Albert1,3531.2%
- 17Clarence1,1691.0%
- 18Roy9190.8%
- 19Willie8820.8%
- 20Samuel8510.8%
- 21Earl8190.7%
- 22Louis8160.7%
- 23Ernest7960.7%
- 24Carl7860.7%
- 25Paul7430.7%
- 26Richard7320.7%
- 27David7240.6%
- 28Joe7210.6%
- 29Raymond7030.6%
- 30Charlie6910.6%
- 31Ralph6360.6%
- 32Elmer5740.5%
- 33Oscar5740.5%
- 34Harold5660.5%
- 35Howard5560.5%
- 36Jesse5410.5%
- 37Will5380.5%
- 38Alfred5300.5%
- 39Daniel5220.5%
- 40Andrew5200.5%
- 41Herbert5190.5%
- 42Benjamin4820.4%
- 43Sam4810.4%
- 44Herman4550.4%
- 45Leo4480.4%
- 46Lee4450.4%
- 47Frederick4320.4%
- 48Francis4180.4%
- 49Michael4070.4%
- 50Jack4050.4%
- 51Lawrence3950.4%
- 52Claude3940.4%
- 53Eugene3920.3%
- 54Peter3920.3%
- 55Clyde3910.3%
- 56Ray3780.3%
- 57Lewis3640.3%
- 58Edwin3540.3%
- 59Floyd3510.3%
- 60Tom3490.3%
- 61Martin3470.3%
- 62Ben3210.3%
- 63Edgar3100.3%
- 64Homer2930.3%
- 65Jacob2920.3%
- 66Chester2910.3%
- 67Grover2890.3%
- 68Harvey2840.3%
- 69Leonard2750.2%
- 70Luther2710.2%
- 71Clifford2690.2%
- 72Guy2670.2%
- 73Otto2570.2%
- 74Jim2550.2%
- 75Russell2460.2%
- 76Leroy2440.2%
- 77Lester2430.2%
- 78Hugh2410.2%
- 79Patrick2340.2%
- 80Ed2250.2%
- 81Anthony2200.2%
- 82Eddie2200.2%
- 83Alexander2180.2%
- 84Bernard2170.2%
- 85Jessie2140.2%
- 86Oliver2140.2%
- 87Stanley2120.2%
- 88Leon2110.2%
- 89Lloyd2110.2%
- 90Theodore2090.2%
- 91Philip2080.2%
- 92Julius1950.2%
- 93Archie1940.2%
- 94Charley1910.2%
- 95Leslie1850.2%
- 96Bert1840.2%
- 97Isaac1820.2%
- 98Ira1810.2%
- 99Allen1800.2%
- 100Percy1770.2%
Percentages are each name’s share of all 1893 applications for that sex — a useful reminder of how much more concentrated naming used to be. In 1880 the top girls’ name alone accounted for several percent of all girls; today the #1 name is well under one percent.
Counts are based on U.S. births and are tracked separately for girls and boys. Names used fewer than 5 times in a year aren’t published for that year, so totals here are a floor — the shortfall is largest in the sparse early years.