Most Popular Baby Names Of 1894
The 100 most-used girls’ and boys’ names among U.S. births in 1894 — 338,670 recorded births in total that year.
Girls’ names
- 1Mary13,1515.9%
- 2Anna5,5652.5%
- 3Margaret3,7001.7%
- 4Helen3,6761.6%
- 5Elizabeth3,4251.5%
- 6Ruth3,3721.5%
- 7Ethel3,2871.5%
- 8Florence3,2331.5%
- 9Emma2,9371.3%
- 10Marie2,6491.2%
- 11Clara2,6031.2%
- 12Minnie2,5921.2%
- 13Bessie2,5201.1%
- 14Bertha2,4961.1%
- 15Edna2,4581.1%
- 16Lillian2,4411.1%
- 17Alice2,4141.1%
- 18Annie2,3931.1%
- 19Grace2,3611.1%
- 20Mabel2,2211.0%
- 21Ida2,1951.0%
- 22Rose2,1261.0%
- 23Hazel2,1030.9%
- 24Martha1,9680.9%
- 25Gertrude1,9080.9%
- 26Edith1,8200.8%
- 27Myrtle1,8180.8%
- 28Pearl1,7890.8%
- 29Frances1,7760.8%
- 30Nellie1,7670.8%
- 31Ella1,7610.8%
- 32Laura1,7300.8%
- 33Elsie1,7160.8%
- 34Sarah1,7010.8%
- 35Eva1,6730.8%
- 36Esther1,6540.7%
- 37Louise1,5710.7%
- 38Agnes1,4700.7%
- 39Carrie1,4520.7%
- 40Lillie1,4320.6%
- 41Catherine1,4300.6%
- 42Lena1,3600.6%
- 43Irene1,3470.6%
- 44Hattie1,3250.6%
- 45Julia1,3200.6%
- 46Cora1,3190.6%
- 47Gladys1,2580.6%
- 48Josephine1,2560.6%
- 49Mattie1,2380.6%
- 50Mildred1,2200.5%
- 51Jennie1,2100.5%
- 52Alma1,1770.5%
- 53Maude1,1440.5%
- 54Mae1,1340.5%
- 55Jessie1,1200.5%
- 56Blanche1,0910.5%
- 57Lucy1,0770.5%
- 58Dorothy1,0520.5%
- 59Mamie1,0430.5%
- 60Lula1,0420.5%
- 61Stella1,0350.5%
- 62Ada1,0180.5%
- 63Fannie1,0030.4%
- 64Katherine9480.4%
- 65Viola9060.4%
- 66Maggie8950.4%
- 67Ruby8740.4%
- 68Nora8540.4%
- 69Dora8270.4%
- 70Rosa7800.3%
- 71May7630.3%
- 72Ellen7590.3%
- 73Sadie7450.3%
- 74Effie7120.3%
- 75Willie7090.3%
- 76Beatrice6840.3%
- 77Della6810.3%
- 78Susie6790.3%
- 79Beulah6750.3%
- 80Pauline6560.3%
- 81Daisy6450.3%
- 82Nettie6300.3%
- 83Marguerite6240.3%
- 84Flora6190.3%
- 85Lydia6180.3%
- 86Vera6180.3%
- 87Lottie5970.3%
- 88Olive5890.3%
- 89Marion5870.3%
- 90Sallie5840.3%
- 91Virginia5830.3%
- 92Lizzie5620.3%
- 93Emily5510.2%
- 94Georgia5350.2%
- 95Katie5250.2%
- 96Kathryn5200.2%
- 97Etta5190.2%
- 98Nancy5150.2%
- 99Evelyn4910.2%
- 100Charlotte4840.2%
Boys’ names
- 1John8,2377.1%
- 2William7,2746.3%
- 3James5,1104.4%
- 4George4,3653.8%
- 5Charles3,7883.3%
- 6Joseph2,9772.6%
- 7Frank2,8632.5%
- 8Robert2,4972.2%
- 9Henry2,2782.0%
- 10Harry2,1891.9%
- 11Edward2,1791.9%
- 12Thomas2,1701.9%
- 13Walter2,0101.7%
- 14Arthur1,7121.5%
- 15Fred1,4751.3%
- 16Albert1,4471.3%
- 17Clarence1,1851.0%
- 18Roy1,0180.9%
- 19Willie9860.9%
- 20Earl8960.8%
- 21Louis8690.8%
- 22Carl8610.7%
- 23Paul8240.7%
- 24Ernest8210.7%
- 25Richard8080.7%
- 26Samuel7760.7%
- 27Raymond7670.7%
- 28Joe7410.6%
- 29David7290.6%
- 30Charlie7040.6%
- 31Ralph6920.6%
- 32Harold6900.6%
- 33Howard6120.5%
- 34Oscar6010.5%
- 35Andrew5940.5%
- 36Herbert5850.5%
- 37Elmer5750.5%
- 38Jesse5670.5%
- 39Will5590.5%
- 40Alfred5210.5%
- 41Daniel5150.4%
- 42Leo5150.4%
- 43Sam5070.4%
- 44Benjamin4690.4%
- 45Lee4550.4%
- 46Floyd4450.4%
- 47Jack4410.4%
- 48Herman4330.4%
- 49Lawrence4300.4%
- 50Francis4230.4%
- 51Michael4230.4%
- 52Eugene4210.4%
- 53Claude4190.4%
- 54Frederick4130.4%
- 55Peter3910.3%
- 56Clyde3860.3%
- 57Ray3790.3%
- 58Edwin3660.3%
- 59Lewis3590.3%
- 60Leonard3430.3%
- 61Tom3430.3%
- 62Ben3260.3%
- 63Chester3250.3%
- 64Edgar3130.3%
- 65Clifford3070.3%
- 66Martin2990.3%
- 67Harvey2930.3%
- 68Jacob2920.3%
- 69Lester2910.3%
- 70Jim2870.2%
- 71Luther2850.2%
- 72Russell2780.2%
- 73Homer2730.2%
- 74Otto2700.2%
- 75Hugh2690.2%
- 76Guy2610.2%
- 77Anthony2570.2%
- 78Bernard2560.2%
- 79Jessie2550.2%
- 80Lloyd2530.2%
- 81Ed2410.2%
- 82Theodore2410.2%
- 83Leroy2390.2%
- 84Leon2360.2%
- 85Patrick2290.2%
- 86Everett2260.2%
- 87Leslie2230.2%
- 88Oliver2220.2%
- 89Allen2190.2%
- 90Stanley2180.2%
- 91Philip2140.2%
- 92Archie2070.2%
- 93Ira2060.2%
- 94Eddie2030.2%
- 95Alexander1990.2%
- 96Norman1990.2%
- 97Horace1960.2%
- 98Bert1870.2%
- 99Charley1860.2%
- 100Victor1800.2%
Percentages are each name’s share of all 1894 applications for that sex — a useful reminder of how much more concentrated naming used to be. In 1880 the top girls’ name alone accounted for several percent of all girls; today the #1 name is well under one percent.
Counts are based on U.S. births and are tracked separately for girls and boys. Names used fewer than 5 times in a year aren’t published for that year, so totals here are a floor — the shortfall is largest in the sparse early years.