Most Popular Baby Names Of 1895
The 100 most-used girls’ and boys’ names among U.S. births in 1895 — 351,011 recorded births in total that year.
Girls’ names
- 1Mary13,4475.8%
- 2Anna5,9502.5%
- 3Helen4,0231.7%
- 4Margaret3,9311.7%
- 5Elizabeth3,6031.5%
- 6Ruth3,5511.5%
- 7Florence3,4711.5%
- 8Ethel3,3911.5%
- 9Marie3,0111.3%
- 10Emma2,9521.3%
- 11Bertha2,6261.1%
- 12Clara2,6131.1%
- 13Minnie2,5671.1%
- 14Edna2,5601.1%
- 15Bessie2,5421.1%
- 16Lillian2,4951.1%
- 17Alice2,4571.1%
- 18Grace2,4481.0%
- 19Annie2,3901.0%
- 20Mabel2,3591.0%
- 21Rose2,2621.0%
- 22Hazel2,2521.0%
- 23Ida2,1700.9%
- 24Gertrude2,1290.9%
- 25Martha2,0960.9%
- 26Pearl1,9580.8%
- 27Edith1,9400.8%
- 28Myrtle1,9380.8%
- 29Frances1,8330.8%
- 30Nellie1,8330.8%
- 31Esther1,8030.8%
- 32Elsie1,7950.8%
- 33Sarah1,7770.8%
- 34Eva1,7670.8%
- 35Ella1,6920.7%
- 36Laura1,6430.7%
- 37Louise1,5820.7%
- 38Catherine1,5140.6%
- 39Mildred1,4740.6%
- 40Agnes1,4660.6%
- 41Gladys1,4640.6%
- 42Carrie1,4630.6%
- 43Irene1,4280.6%
- 44Lillie1,4140.6%
- 45Julia1,3800.6%
- 46Hattie1,3380.6%
- 47Josephine1,3340.6%
- 48Jessie1,3000.6%
- 49Cora1,2950.6%
- 50Lena1,2890.6%
- 51Mattie1,2760.5%
- 52Mae1,1930.5%
- 53Jennie1,1770.5%
- 54Blanche1,1560.5%
- 55Alma1,1440.5%
- 56Maude1,1360.5%
- 57Dorothy1,1270.5%
- 58Ada1,1240.5%
- 59Mamie1,1190.5%
- 60Stella1,0260.4%
- 61Lucy1,0160.4%
- 62Fannie1,0120.4%
- 63Viola1,0100.4%
- 64Lula9870.4%
- 65Katherine9680.4%
- 66Ruby9540.4%
- 67Maggie8900.4%
- 68Dora8840.4%
- 69Marion8560.4%
- 70Nora8460.4%
- 71Rosa8320.4%
- 72Sadie8290.4%
- 73Beatrice8140.3%
- 74Beulah7600.3%
- 75Ellen7460.3%
- 76Pauline7340.3%
- 77Vera7290.3%
- 78Willie7240.3%
- 79Effie7080.3%
- 80May6910.3%
- 81Marguerite6800.3%
- 82Nettie6770.3%
- 83Susie6740.3%
- 84Daisy6650.3%
- 85Lydia6560.3%
- 86Della6480.3%
- 87Evelyn6300.3%
- 88Virginia6280.3%
- 89Emily6050.3%
- 90Kathryn5850.3%
- 91Olive5770.2%
- 92Sallie5730.2%
- 93Nancy5660.2%
- 94Georgia5620.2%
- 95Lottie5530.2%
- 96Flora5520.2%
- 97Ann5510.2%
- 98Eleanor5440.2%
- 99Lizzie5430.2%
- 100Katie5360.2%
Boys’ names
- 1John8,3207.1%
- 2William7,2776.2%
- 3James5,3354.5%
- 4George4,2893.7%
- 5Charles3,6333.1%
- 6Frank3,0122.6%
- 7Joseph2,9922.5%
- 8Robert2,6352.2%
- 9Henry2,2211.9%
- 10Edward2,2031.9%
- 11Thomas2,1531.8%
- 12Harry2,1281.8%
- 13Walter2,0151.7%
- 14Arthur1,6661.4%
- 15Fred1,4831.3%
- 16Albert1,3911.2%
- 17Clarence1,3261.1%
- 18Willie1,0710.9%
- 19Roy1,0280.9%
- 20Paul9330.8%
- 21Louis9130.8%
- 22Carl8510.7%
- 23Earl8510.7%
- 24Ernest8340.7%
- 25Samuel8140.7%
- 26Raymond8060.7%
- 27Charlie7670.7%
- 28Joe7630.7%
- 29Harold7530.6%
- 30Ralph7360.6%
- 31Richard7270.6%
- 32David7070.6%
- 33Howard6410.5%
- 34Elmer6100.5%
- 35Jesse5770.5%
- 36Herbert5690.5%
- 37Andrew5620.5%
- 38Alfred5510.5%
- 39Oscar5490.5%
- 40Daniel5160.4%
- 41Lawrence5090.4%
- 42Leo5090.4%
- 43Sam4870.4%
- 44Will4850.4%
- 45Francis4800.4%
- 46Jack4790.4%
- 47Lee4780.4%
- 48Benjamin4520.4%
- 49Herman4390.4%
- 50Eugene4300.4%
- 51Floyd4270.4%
- 52Michael4130.4%
- 53Peter4120.4%
- 54Frederick4060.3%
- 55Claude3890.3%
- 56Ray3800.3%
- 57Chester3770.3%
- 58Lewis3770.3%
- 59Clyde3700.3%
- 60Edwin3460.3%
- 61Leonard3420.3%
- 62Tom3350.3%
- 63Ben3240.3%
- 64Edgar3230.3%
- 65Martin3170.3%
- 66Russell3000.3%
- 67Homer2960.3%
- 68Lester2950.3%
- 69Otto2830.2%
- 70Harvey2820.2%
- 71Jim2780.2%
- 72Clifford2720.2%
- 73Luther2690.2%
- 74Jacob2660.2%
- 75Lloyd2630.2%
- 76Guy2610.2%
- 77Bernard2590.2%
- 78Leroy2490.2%
- 79Jessie2450.2%
- 80Hugh2430.2%
- 81Leslie2350.2%
- 82Patrick2330.2%
- 83Stanley2330.2%
- 84Ed2290.2%
- 85Eddie2280.2%
- 86Anthony2210.2%
- 87Leon2190.2%
- 88Oliver2160.2%
- 89Archie2120.2%
- 90Horace2110.2%
- 91Norman2110.2%
- 92Philip2110.2%
- 93Theodore2080.2%
- 94Everett2070.2%
- 95Ira2070.2%
- 96Donald2030.2%
- 97Alexander1990.2%
- 98Allen1960.2%
- 99Victor1960.2%
- 100Cecil1920.2%
Percentages are each name’s share of all 1895 applications for that sex — a useful reminder of how much more concentrated naming used to be. In 1880 the top girls’ name alone accounted for several percent of all girls; today the #1 name is well under one percent.
Counts are based on U.S. births and are tracked separately for girls and boys. Names used fewer than 5 times in a year aren’t published for that year, so totals here are a floor — the shortfall is largest in the sparse early years.