Most Popular Baby Names Of 1896
The 100 most-used girls’ and boys’ names among U.S. births in 1896 — 357,468 recorded births in total that year.
Girls’ names
- 1Mary13,8115.8%
- 2Anna5,8602.5%
- 3Helen4,3921.8%
- 4Margaret4,0501.7%
- 5Ruth3,9051.6%
- 6Ethel3,5021.5%
- 7Elizabeth3,4711.5%
- 8Florence3,3231.4%
- 9Marie3,0871.3%
- 10Emma2,8721.2%
- 11Lillian2,7021.1%
- 12Alice2,6511.1%
- 13Edna2,6041.1%
- 14Clara2,5821.1%
- 15Bertha2,5651.1%
- 16Minnie2,5301.1%
- 17Grace2,4851.0%
- 18Bessie2,4351.0%
- 19Annie2,3581.0%
- 20Rose2,3411.0%
- 21Mabel2,2831.0%
- 22Hazel2,2260.9%
- 23Gertrude2,2210.9%
- 24Ida2,1590.9%
- 25Pearl2,1010.9%
- 26Martha2,0220.8%
- 27Esther1,9640.8%
- 28Frances1,9640.8%
- 29Edith1,9320.8%
- 30Myrtle1,9280.8%
- 31Elsie1,8780.8%
- 32Eva1,7790.7%
- 33Gladys1,7570.7%
- 34Nellie1,6960.7%
- 35Sarah1,6910.7%
- 36Ella1,6830.7%
- 37Laura1,6650.7%
- 38Agnes1,6540.7%
- 39Mildred1,6200.7%
- 40Catherine1,5940.7%
- 41Irene1,5930.7%
- 42Louise1,5310.6%
- 43Lillie1,4830.6%
- 44Julia1,4070.6%
- 45Carrie1,3880.6%
- 46Dorothy1,3660.6%
- 47Hattie1,3200.6%
- 48Lena1,3180.6%
- 49Mattie1,2880.5%
- 50Josephine1,2560.5%
- 51Alma1,2430.5%
- 52Cora1,2040.5%
- 53Jennie1,1780.5%
- 54Blanche1,1500.5%
- 55Mae1,1480.5%
- 56Maude1,1040.5%
- 57Jessie1,1030.5%
- 58Mamie1,0810.5%
- 59Lucy1,0740.5%
- 60Stella1,0540.4%
- 61Katherine1,0470.4%
- 62Viola1,0470.4%
- 63Ada1,0410.4%
- 64Lula1,0120.4%
- 65Fannie1,0010.4%
- 66Ruby9940.4%
- 67Marion9870.4%
- 68Dora8740.4%
- 69Maggie8710.4%
- 70Beatrice8700.4%
- 71Nora8440.4%
- 72Sadie8270.3%
- 73Ellen8110.3%
- 74Rosa8080.3%
- 75Pauline7560.3%
- 76Willie7550.3%
- 77Beulah7500.3%
- 78Marguerite7250.3%
- 79Susie7180.3%
- 80Effie7160.3%
- 81Vera6750.3%
- 82May6710.3%
- 83Daisy6610.3%
- 84Evelyn6460.3%
- 85Della6420.3%
- 86Lucille6370.3%
- 87Nettie6280.3%
- 88Kathryn6250.3%
- 89Virginia6210.3%
- 90Olive5830.2%
- 91Lydia5800.2%
- 92Lottie5740.2%
- 93Georgia5620.2%
- 94Leona5560.2%
- 95Hilda5490.2%
- 96Emily5270.2%
- 97Flora5270.2%
- 98Nancy5270.2%
- 99Katie5160.2%
- 100Lizzie5080.2%
Boys’ names
- 1John8,1386.8%
- 2William7,7476.5%
- 3James5,2064.4%
- 4George4,2863.6%
- 5Charles3,6393.0%
- 6Joseph3,0512.6%
- 7Frank2,8452.4%
- 8Robert2,7192.3%
- 9Edward2,2961.9%
- 10Henry2,1831.8%
- 11Harry2,0911.7%
- 12Thomas2,0881.7%
- 13Walter2,0171.7%
- 14Arthur1,8211.5%
- 15Albert1,4341.2%
- 16Fred1,3931.2%
- 17Clarence1,2541.0%
- 18Willie1,0920.9%
- 19Roy1,0270.9%
- 20Paul9640.8%
- 21Earl8920.7%
- 22Louis8710.7%
- 23Harold8620.7%
- 24Raymond8590.7%
- 25Carl8520.7%
- 26Richard8340.7%
- 27Joe7670.6%
- 28David7650.6%
- 29Ernest7640.6%
- 30Ralph7460.6%
- 31Samuel7340.6%
- 32Charlie7140.6%
- 33Howard6770.6%
- 34Herbert6350.5%
- 35Jesse5860.5%
- 36Elmer5760.5%
- 37Andrew5660.5%
- 38Daniel5610.5%
- 39Francis5510.5%
- 40Jack5390.5%
- 41Oscar5390.5%
- 42Alfred5270.4%
- 43Sam5180.4%
- 44Will5080.4%
- 45Eugene5070.4%
- 46Lawrence4990.4%
- 47Leo4970.4%
- 48Lee4550.4%
- 49Herman4270.4%
- 50Ray4260.4%
- 51Benjamin4160.3%
- 52Peter4020.3%
- 53Michael3990.3%
- 54Claude3980.3%
- 55Floyd3960.3%
- 56Lewis3860.3%
- 57Frederick3810.3%
- 58Clyde3720.3%
- 59Edwin3510.3%
- 60Leonard3500.3%
- 61Martin3430.3%
- 62Tom3390.3%
- 63Chester3290.3%
- 64Russell3270.3%
- 65Lester3180.3%
- 66Clifford3110.3%
- 67Lloyd3080.3%
- 68Edgar3060.3%
- 69Ben2990.3%
- 70Harvey2920.2%
- 71Jim2810.2%
- 72Leroy2780.2%
- 73Anthony2760.2%
- 74Luther2650.2%
- 75Hugh2630.2%
- 76Eddie2620.2%
- 77Guy2620.2%
- 78Stanley2590.2%
- 79Homer2580.2%
- 80Otto2500.2%
- 81Ed2460.2%
- 82Bernard2410.2%
- 83Jacob2410.2%
- 84Theodore2410.2%
- 85Leslie2370.2%
- 86Leon2350.2%
- 87Alexander2320.2%
- 88Archie2300.2%
- 89Jessie2290.2%
- 90Everett2240.2%
- 91Allen2190.2%
- 92Philip2180.2%
- 93Patrick2140.2%
- 94Donald2110.2%
- 95Horace2040.2%
- 96Victor2010.2%
- 97Cecil2000.2%
- 98Milton1940.2%
- 99Oliver1940.2%
- 100Isaac1910.2%
Percentages are each name’s share of all 1896 applications for that sex — a useful reminder of how much more concentrated naming used to be. In 1880 the top girls’ name alone accounted for several percent of all girls; today the #1 name is well under one percent.
Counts are based on U.S. births and are tracked separately for girls and boys. Names used fewer than 5 times in a year aren’t published for that year, so totals here are a floor — the shortfall is largest in the sparse early years.