Most Popular Baby Names Of 1902
The 100 most-used girls’ and boys’ names among U.S. births in 1902 — 386,710 recorded births in total that year.
Girls’ names
- 1Mary14,4865.5%
- 2Helen5,9672.3%
- 3Anna5,2882.0%
- 4Margaret5,0111.9%
- 5Ruth4,3841.7%
- 6Elizabeth3,6941.4%
- 7Florence3,5091.3%
- 8Marie3,4241.3%
- 9Ethel3,2951.2%
- 10Alice3,1351.2%
- 11Lillian3,0631.2%
- 12Gladys2,8091.1%
- 13Edna2,7541.0%
- 14Mildred2,7501.0%
- 15Dorothy2,7071.0%
- 16Annie2,6641.0%
- 17Grace2,6421.0%
- 18Emma2,5141.0%
- 19Bessie2,4480.9%
- 20Rose2,4440.9%
- 21Clara2,4320.9%
- 22Bertha2,3720.9%
- 23Frances2,3260.9%
- 24Mabel2,2800.9%
- 25Hazel2,2380.8%
- 26Irene2,2100.8%
- 27Gertrude2,2070.8%
- 28Pearl2,1000.8%
- 29Minnie2,0550.8%
- 30Martha2,0300.8%
- 31Catherine1,8960.7%
- 32Myrtle1,8840.7%
- 33Edith1,8530.7%
- 34Ida1,8360.7%
- 35Esther1,8330.7%
- 36Louise1,8320.7%
- 37Eva1,7270.7%
- 38Elsie1,7200.7%
- 39Sarah1,7100.6%
- 40Agnes1,6760.6%
- 41Nellie1,5660.6%
- 42Josephine1,5650.6%
- 43Laura1,5590.6%
- 44Lillie1,5330.6%
- 45Ella1,5250.6%
- 46Julia1,5010.6%
- 47Ruby1,4580.6%
- 48Viola1,4470.5%
- 49Beatrice1,4290.5%
- 50Carrie1,3760.5%
- 51Mattie1,3530.5%
- 52Thelma1,3090.5%
- 53Mae1,2610.5%
- 54Jessie1,2400.5%
- 55Alma1,2290.5%
- 56Lena1,2250.5%
- 57Hattie1,1630.4%
- 58Blanche1,1590.4%
- 59Evelyn1,1510.4%
- 60Mamie1,1270.4%
- 61Lucille1,0870.4%
- 62Cora1,0810.4%
- 63Stella1,0750.4%
- 64Willie1,0710.4%
- 65Lucy1,0650.4%
- 66Marion1,0330.4%
- 67Virginia1,0080.4%
- 68Katherine1,0040.4%
- 69Jennie9850.4%
- 70Pauline9850.4%
- 71Lula9760.4%
- 72Fannie9710.4%
- 73Vera9470.4%
- 74Ada9210.3%
- 75Rosa9090.3%
- 76Leona8750.3%
- 77Beulah8730.3%
- 78Maggie8530.3%
- 79Eleanor8370.3%
- 80Maude8340.3%
- 81Bernice7940.3%
- 82Dora7800.3%
- 83Ann7530.3%
- 84Ellen7530.3%
- 85Daisy7480.3%
- 86Nora7240.3%
- 87Kathryn7170.3%
- 88Susie7170.3%
- 89Sadie7160.3%
- 90Marguerite6950.3%
- 91Georgia6640.3%
- 92Effie6580.2%
- 93Doris6560.2%
- 94Hilda6490.2%
- 95Violet6490.2%
- 96Della6090.2%
- 97Emily6060.2%
- 98Lois5940.2%
- 99Olive5930.2%
- 100Flora5870.2%
Boys’ names
- 1John7,9076.4%
- 2William6,6175.4%
- 3James5,5924.6%
- 4George4,2233.4%
- 5Charles3,3612.7%
- 6Robert3,1802.6%
- 7Joseph3,0982.5%
- 8Frank2,7562.2%
- 9Edward2,2941.9%
- 10Henry2,1541.8%
- 11Thomas2,1341.7%
- 12Walter1,8581.5%
- 13Harry1,7501.4%
- 14Willie1,5651.3%
- 15Arthur1,4871.2%
- 16Albert1,3751.1%
- 17Clarence1,2921.1%
- 18Fred1,2861.0%
- 19Harold1,0770.9%
- 20Paul1,0670.9%
- 21Raymond1,0640.9%
- 22Roy1,0020.8%
- 23Joe9550.8%
- 24Carl9520.8%
- 25Louis9120.7%
- 26Richard9080.7%
- 27Earl8770.7%
- 28Ralph8660.7%
- 29Ernest7900.6%
- 30Charlie7610.6%
- 31David7610.6%
- 32Jack7430.6%
- 33Samuel7020.6%
- 34Theodore6420.5%
- 35Howard6320.5%
- 36Herbert6150.5%
- 37Lawrence5980.5%
- 38Francis5970.5%
- 39Alfred5900.5%
- 40Elmer5740.5%
- 41Sam5590.5%
- 42Andrew5580.5%
- 43Leo5510.4%
- 44Eugene5240.4%
- 45Daniel5010.4%
- 46Lee4750.4%
- 47Floyd4710.4%
- 48Michael4600.4%
- 49Herman4570.4%
- 50Jesse4370.4%
- 51Peter4330.4%
- 52Leonard4260.3%
- 53Russell4220.3%
- 54Anthony4200.3%
- 55Oscar3970.3%
- 56Edwin3930.3%
- 57Ray3910.3%
- 58Lester3850.3%
- 59Lewis3850.3%
- 60Clyde3820.3%
- 61Benjamin3740.3%
- 62Leroy3700.3%
- 63Donald3660.3%
- 64Will3590.3%
- 65Cecil3540.3%
- 66Eddie3530.3%
- 67Lloyd3440.3%
- 68Claude3360.3%
- 69Stanley3340.3%
- 70Frederick3300.3%
- 71Clifford3260.3%
- 72Martin3250.3%
- 73Jessie3230.3%
- 74Chester3210.3%
- 75Tom3120.3%
- 76Edgar3070.3%
- 77Jim3000.2%
- 78Kenneth2750.2%
- 79Ben2730.2%
- 80Homer2690.2%
- 81Luther2660.2%
- 82Harvey2640.2%
- 83Bernard2590.2%
- 84Norman2560.2%
- 85Leslie2510.2%
- 86Leon2480.2%
- 87Melvin2480.2%
- 88Everett2380.2%
- 89Allen2270.2%
- 90Philip2260.2%
- 91Johnnie2210.2%
- 92Hugh2170.2%
- 93Alexander2160.2%
- 94Stephen2100.2%
- 95Jacob2070.2%
- 96Milton2070.2%
- 97Victor2050.2%
- 98Patrick2030.2%
- 99Alvin2010.2%
- 100Horace1990.2%
Percentages are each name’s share of all 1902 applications for that sex — a useful reminder of how much more concentrated naming used to be. In 1880 the top girls’ name alone accounted for several percent of all girls; today the #1 name is well under one percent.
Counts are based on U.S. births and are tracked separately for girls and boys. Names used fewer than 5 times in a year aren’t published for that year, so totals here are a floor — the shortfall is largest in the sparse early years.