Most Popular Baby Names Of 1903
The 100 most-used girls’ and boys’ names among U.S. births in 1903 — 381,183 recorded births in total that year.
Girls’ names
- 1Mary14,2755.4%
- 2Helen6,1292.3%
- 3Anna5,0981.9%
- 4Margaret5,0451.9%
- 5Ruth4,5171.7%
- 6Elizabeth3,7241.4%
- 7Marie3,4691.3%
- 8Florence3,4681.3%
- 9Ethel3,2571.2%
- 10Mildred3,0881.2%
- 11Dorothy3,0781.2%
- 12Alice2,9961.1%
- 13Lillian2,9721.1%
- 14Gladys2,6741.0%
- 15Edna2,6671.0%
- 16Grace2,6161.0%
- 17Annie2,5511.0%
- 18Rose2,4780.9%
- 19Frances2,3650.9%
- 20Clara2,3420.9%
- 21Bessie2,3390.9%
- 22Bertha2,3090.9%
- 23Emma2,3080.9%
- 24Gertrude2,2530.9%
- 25Mabel2,1630.8%
- 26Hazel2,1390.8%
- 27Pearl2,0460.8%
- 28Irene2,0010.8%
- 29Martha1,9800.8%
- 30Myrtle1,9800.8%
- 31Louise1,9350.7%
- 32Catherine1,9160.7%
- 33Edith1,9010.7%
- 34Esther1,8830.7%
- 35Minnie1,8460.7%
- 36Eva1,7830.7%
- 37Ida1,7740.7%
- 38Elsie1,7200.7%
- 39Agnes1,6160.6%
- 40Josephine1,5870.6%
- 41Sarah1,5530.6%
- 42Ruby1,5380.6%
- 43Laura1,5030.6%
- 44Viola1,4950.6%
- 45Nellie1,4910.6%
- 46Lillie1,4850.6%
- 47Thelma1,4790.6%
- 48Julia1,4470.6%
- 49Beatrice1,4390.5%
- 50Ella1,4190.5%
- 51Mattie1,2780.5%
- 52Carrie1,2520.5%
- 53Alma1,2440.5%
- 54Evelyn1,2110.5%
- 55Jessie1,2020.5%
- 56Lena1,2000.5%
- 57Lucille1,1930.5%
- 58Mae1,1920.5%
- 59Blanche1,1740.4%
- 60Hattie1,1060.4%
- 61Marion1,0420.4%
- 62Pauline1,0420.4%
- 63Virginia1,0320.4%
- 64Fannie1,0160.4%
- 65Stella1,0160.4%
- 66Katherine1,0150.4%
- 67Willie1,0140.4%
- 68Lucy9900.4%
- 69Mamie9900.4%
- 70Cora9860.4%
- 71Jennie9360.4%
- 72Beulah9200.4%
- 73Lula9130.3%
- 74Rosa9110.3%
- 75Vera8990.3%
- 76Leona8810.3%
- 77Bernice8680.3%
- 78Ada8430.3%
- 79Eleanor8400.3%
- 80Maggie7800.3%
- 81Dora7780.3%
- 82Daisy7760.3%
- 83Maude7760.3%
- 84Ann7740.3%
- 85Ellen7730.3%
- 86Kathryn7290.3%
- 87Nora7240.3%
- 88Hilda6980.3%
- 89Sadie6830.3%
- 90Susie6800.3%
- 91Marguerite6670.3%
- 92Lois6640.3%
- 93Violet6360.2%
- 94Georgia6320.2%
- 95Doris6290.2%
- 96Della6110.2%
- 97Olive5970.2%
- 98Betty5960.2%
- 99Velma5890.2%
- 100Anne5810.2%
Boys’ names
- 1John7,6086.4%
- 2William6,3115.3%
- 3James5,4794.6%
- 4George3,9613.3%
- 5Charles3,2132.7%
- 6Joseph3,1212.6%
- 7Robert3,0442.6%
- 8Frank2,6442.2%
- 9Edward2,2681.9%
- 10Thomas1,9621.6%
- 11Henry1,9221.6%
- 12Walter1,8401.5%
- 13Harry1,6471.4%
- 14Willie1,4541.2%
- 15Arthur1,4351.2%
- 16Albert1,3371.1%
- 17Clarence1,2611.1%
- 18Fred1,2041.0%
- 19Paul1,0810.9%
- 20Harold1,0650.9%
- 21Raymond1,0510.9%
- 22Roy9750.8%
- 23Carl9100.8%
- 24Joe8950.8%
- 25Louis8890.7%
- 26Richard8620.7%
- 27Earl8370.7%
- 28Jack8310.7%
- 29Ralph8070.7%
- 30Ernest7640.6%
- 31Samuel7410.6%
- 32Charlie7390.6%
- 33David7160.6%
- 34Herbert6680.6%
- 35Francis6650.6%
- 36Theodore6630.6%
- 37Howard6360.5%
- 38Leo6360.5%
- 39Alfred5570.5%
- 40Elmer5560.5%
- 41Sam5520.5%
- 42Andrew5500.5%
- 43Lawrence5360.4%
- 44Eugene4780.4%
- 45Lee4770.4%
- 46Floyd4720.4%
- 47Michael4660.4%
- 48Herman4490.4%
- 49Leonard4480.4%
- 50Daniel4320.4%
- 51Oscar4270.4%
- 52Clyde4130.3%
- 53Lester4000.3%
- 54Anthony3990.3%
- 55Ray3970.3%
- 56Russell3900.3%
- 57Jesse3880.3%
- 58Peter3720.3%
- 59Stanley3610.3%
- 60Donald3590.3%
- 61Clifford3480.3%
- 62Edwin3470.3%
- 63Frederick3410.3%
- 64Leroy3400.3%
- 65Lewis3350.3%
- 66Cecil3320.3%
- 67Kenneth3300.3%
- 68Chester3270.3%
- 69Benjamin3240.3%
- 70Eddie3140.3%
- 71Claude3010.3%
- 72Lloyd2990.3%
- 73Tom2950.2%
- 74Harvey2930.2%
- 75Will2930.2%
- 76Leon2870.2%
- 77Martin2830.2%
- 78Jessie2800.2%
- 79Bernard2710.2%
- 80Luther2650.2%
- 81Ben2590.2%
- 82Edgar2590.2%
- 83Homer2570.2%
- 84Jim2570.2%
- 85Philip2500.2%
- 86Norman2380.2%
- 87Johnnie2370.2%
- 88Melvin2300.2%
- 89Leslie2270.2%
- 90Alvin2220.2%
- 91Allen2190.2%
- 92Milton2100.2%
- 93Oliver2100.2%
- 94Patrick2100.2%
- 95Everett2040.2%
- 96Stephen2000.2%
- 97Glenn1980.2%
- 98Roosevelt1960.2%
- 99Victor1960.2%
- 100Alexander1950.2%
Percentages are each name’s share of all 1903 applications for that sex — a useful reminder of how much more concentrated naming used to be. In 1880 the top girls’ name alone accounted for several percent of all girls; today the #1 name is well under one percent.
Counts are based on U.S. births and are tracked separately for girls and boys. Names used fewer than 5 times in a year aren’t published for that year, so totals here are a floor — the shortfall is largest in the sparse early years.