Most Popular Baby Names Of 1904
The 100 most-used girls’ and boys’ names among U.S. births in 1904 — 403,467 recorded births in total that year.
Girls’ names
- 1Mary14,9615.4%
- 2Helen6,4882.4%
- 3Anna5,3301.9%
- 4Margaret5,3021.9%
- 5Ruth4,9001.8%
- 6Elizabeth3,8331.4%
- 7Marie3,5951.3%
- 8Florence3,5721.3%
- 9Mildred3,5251.3%
- 10Dorothy3,4771.3%
- 11Ethel3,2961.2%
- 12Lillian3,1391.1%
- 13Alice3,1311.1%
- 14Gladys2,9761.1%
- 15Edna2,7621.0%
- 16Frances2,6571.0%
- 17Annie2,6311.0%
- 18Rose2,6311.0%
- 19Grace2,5130.9%
- 20Bertha2,3630.9%
- 21Bessie2,3400.8%
- 22Emma2,3120.8%
- 23Hazel2,3010.8%
- 24Clara2,2810.8%
- 25Gertrude2,2690.8%
- 26Irene2,2120.8%
- 27Mabel2,1720.8%
- 28Louise2,1360.8%
- 29Martha2,0190.7%
- 30Pearl2,0150.7%
- 31Catherine1,9820.7%
- 32Esther1,9570.7%
- 33Edith1,9440.7%
- 34Myrtle1,9050.7%
- 35Minnie1,8850.7%
- 36Eva1,8580.7%
- 37Thelma1,7570.6%
- 38Ida1,7510.6%
- 39Elsie1,7190.6%
- 40Josephine1,7010.6%
- 41Ruby1,7010.6%
- 42Agnes1,6720.6%
- 43Sarah1,5940.6%
- 44Nellie1,5600.6%
- 45Beatrice1,5490.6%
- 46Viola1,5450.6%
- 47Laura1,5080.5%
- 48Ella1,4320.5%
- 49Julia1,4260.5%
- 50Evelyn1,3720.5%
- 51Lillie1,3640.5%
- 52Mattie1,3620.5%
- 53Lucille1,3510.5%
- 54Carrie1,2800.5%
- 55Alma1,2570.5%
- 56Pauline1,2430.5%
- 57Lena1,2280.4%
- 58Mae1,2140.4%
- 59Virginia1,2130.4%
- 60Jessie1,1970.4%
- 61Willie1,1880.4%
- 62Blanche1,1420.4%
- 63Katherine1,1280.4%
- 64Hattie1,1230.4%
- 65Marion1,1090.4%
- 66Lucy1,0860.4%
- 67Mamie1,0410.4%
- 68Stella1,0260.4%
- 69Leona9980.4%
- 70Cora9930.4%
- 71Vera9930.4%
- 72Beulah9830.4%
- 73Fannie9640.4%
- 74Jennie9640.4%
- 75Bernice9620.3%
- 76Rosa9030.3%
- 77Lula8940.3%
- 78Ann8800.3%
- 79Ada8780.3%
- 80Eleanor8680.3%
- 81Maggie8050.3%
- 82Dora7880.3%
- 83Kathryn7870.3%
- 84Ellen7740.3%
- 85Daisy7720.3%
- 86Maude7570.3%
- 87Violet7550.3%
- 88Doris7360.3%
- 89Georgia7360.3%
- 90Lois7270.3%
- 91Betty7070.3%
- 92Sadie7030.3%
- 93Nora6980.3%
- 94Marguerite6840.2%
- 95Susie6620.2%
- 96Marjorie6390.2%
- 97Anne6310.2%
- 98Hilda6290.2%
- 99Lola6240.2%
- 100Opal6210.2%
Boys’ names
- 1John8,1086.3%
- 2William6,4165.0%
- 3James5,8554.6%
- 4George4,2193.3%
- 5Robert3,4142.7%
- 6Charles3,4062.7%
- 7Joseph3,2912.6%
- 8Frank2,7992.2%
- 9Edward2,3351.8%
- 10Henry2,0851.6%
- 11Thomas2,0571.6%
- 12Walter1,8731.5%
- 13Harry1,7221.3%
- 14Willie1,6751.3%
- 15Arthur1,4951.2%
- 16Albert1,4531.1%
- 17Clarence1,3101.0%
- 18Fred1,2231.0%
- 19Paul1,1940.9%
- 20Harold1,1860.9%
- 21Roy1,1230.9%
- 22Raymond1,0930.9%
- 23Joe9590.7%
- 24Richard9570.7%
- 25Carl9530.7%
- 26Louis9360.7%
- 27Jack9080.7%
- 28Ralph8990.7%
- 29Earl8540.7%
- 30Theodore8340.7%
- 31David8170.6%
- 32Ernest7490.6%
- 33Charlie7390.6%
- 34Samuel7270.6%
- 35Howard7260.6%
- 36Francis6860.5%
- 37Herbert6800.5%
- 38Lawrence6620.5%
- 39Elmer6200.5%
- 40Sam6030.5%
- 41Alfred6000.5%
- 42Leo5520.4%
- 43Andrew5460.4%
- 44Eugene5410.4%
- 45Lee5320.4%
- 46Leonard5080.4%
- 47Herman4970.4%
- 48Russell4730.4%
- 49Daniel4720.4%
- 50Michael4620.4%
- 51Clyde4570.4%
- 52Floyd4460.3%
- 53Jesse4430.3%
- 54Oscar4420.3%
- 55Ray4320.3%
- 56Anthony4220.3%
- 57Kenneth4140.3%
- 58Donald4130.3%
- 59Lewis4020.3%
- 60Leroy4010.3%
- 61Lester3980.3%
- 62Peter3950.3%
- 63Frederick3900.3%
- 64Edwin3880.3%
- 65Stanley3710.3%
- 66Clifford3610.3%
- 67Cecil3590.3%
- 68Benjamin3580.3%
- 69Chester3550.3%
- 70Claude3370.3%
- 71Martin3340.3%
- 72Bernard3260.3%
- 73Lloyd3240.3%
- 74Tom3180.2%
- 75Eddie3150.2%
- 76Jessie3130.2%
- 77Norman3050.2%
- 78Alton3020.2%
- 79Harvey3000.2%
- 80Edgar2990.2%
- 81Will2870.2%
- 82Luther2860.2%
- 83Ben2820.2%
- 84Johnnie2670.2%
- 85Jim2660.2%
- 86Philip2660.2%
- 87Homer2560.2%
- 88Alvin2470.2%
- 89Jacob2430.2%
- 90Leon2410.2%
- 91Leslie2360.2%
- 92Melvin2340.2%
- 93Milton2300.2%
- 94Roosevelt2300.2%
- 95Everett2290.2%
- 96Allen2280.2%
- 97Patrick2260.2%
- 98Victor2180.2%
- 99Glenn2170.2%
- 100Virgil2110.2%
Percentages are each name’s share of all 1904 applications for that sex — a useful reminder of how much more concentrated naming used to be. In 1880 the top girls’ name alone accounted for several percent of all girls; today the #1 name is well under one percent.
Counts are based on U.S. births and are tracked separately for girls and boys. Names used fewer than 5 times in a year aren’t published for that year, so totals here are a floor — the shortfall is largest in the sparse early years.